Featured Articles

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

Intel's 5th Core processor family, codenamed Broadwell, will launch in three lines for the mobile segment. We are talking about upcoming…

More...
Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Google's Chromebook OS should be updating automatically every six weeks, but Intel doesn't come close with its hardware refresh schedule.

More...
New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

Rumours involving upcoming Nexus devices are nothing uncommon, but this year there is a fair bit of confusion, especially on the…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 11 April 2014 13:46

Sharing details of hacks not anti-trust violation

Written by Nick Farrell



US has to reassure businesses

The US government is on a campaign to reassure corporates that they will not face anti-trust penalties if they share information on hacks. The new push comes as many top retailers and other companies have suffered major data breaches.

James Cole, the number two official at the U.S. Justice Department, told reporters in a briefing on new guidance the agency issued along with the Federal Trade Commission that if companies do not discuss competitive information such as pricing or output when sharing cybersecurity details, they will not conflict with antitrust laws. It is not clear how sharing data on your systems being attack could represent any anti-trust action, but apparently, some companies were concerned.

“This is an antitrust no-brainer: Companies who engage in properly designed cyberthreat information sharing will not run afoul of the antitrust laws,” said Bill Baer, the assistant attorney general in charge of the DOJ’s Antitrust Division. “This means that as long as companies don’t discuss competitive information such as pricing and output when sharing cybersecurity information, they’re OK.”

Michael Daniel, cybersecurity coordinator at the U.S. White House wrote in his blog that in today’s networked world, a cyberthreat to one is really a cyberthreat to all. “This is why steps such as today’s announcement that can encourage more information sharing are key to building up our collective cybersecurity,” he added.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments