Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 09 April 2014 12:59

AMD AM1 platform goes official

Written by Peter Scott

Bay Trail-D beware

AMD has finally lifted the veil off its new AM1 platform. Although the first AM1 boards and processors went on sale a couple of weeks ago, the NDA was lifted just now. The pricing is now official, reviews are about to start popping up online and we have a bit more info on desktop Kabini parts. Sadly though, our sample is stuck at the local customs office, which appears to be staffed by Intel fanboys.

 

AM1-press-lineup

The cheapest AM1 processor is the dual-core Sempron 2650, at just $31. The quad-core Sempron 3850 is priced at $36, while the Athlon 5150 and 5350 cost $45 and $55 respectively. This is in line with expectations, as AMD’s target price for an entry level AM1 motherboard and processor is $60. In fact, we think the overall cost may end up even south of $60, since there the motherboards are somewhat cheaper than expected.

AMD AM1 platform targets Bay Trail-D


AM1 products will have to slug it out with Intel’s entry level desktop platform, better known as Bay Trail-D. Both platforms have something going for them. Bay Trail-D has a significantly lower TDP (10W vs. 25W), but AM1 comes out on top in terms of performance. In addition, AM1 is a socketed platform, so you can upgrade it when the time comes, or replace a faulty processor. With a Bay Trail-D board you can’t.

AM1-press-dieshot

AMD also claims AM1 should end up somewhat cheaper than comparable Bay Trail-D products, namely the quad-core J2850, J2900 and the dual-core J1850/J1900. The fact that AM1 is reparable and upgradeable also adds a bit of value.

Despite its relatively low cost, AM1 does not lack much in terms of features. AM1 boards have more USB 3.0 ports than most Bay Trail-D boards and there’s no shortage of legacy connectors, either.


Faster than Bay Trail, not just in graphics


AMD APUs tends to offer superior GPUs compared to Intel offerings, so we expect nothing less from socketed Kabini parts. However, AMD usually lags behind in the CPU department. Not this time though.

According to AMD’s figures, the Athlon 5350 outpaces the Pentium J2900 by a wide margin even in CPU-intensive tests. In PCMark 8 AMD scores 1906, while Intel delivers 1380 marks. In WinRAR v5.1 AMD comes out on top with 2134KB/s compared to Intel’s 1872KB/s. In Cinebench the new Athlon scores 159, slightly more than Bay Trail’s 153.

AM1-press-compute

The Athlon 5350 also ends up faster in the Peacekeeper web benchmark, TrueCrypt and JPEG decoding tests.

In GPU and OpenCL tests Kabini wipes the floor with Bay Trail parts. In Cinebench’s OpenGL test it scores 13.78FPS compared to Intel’s 4.02FPS. In LibreOffice calc with OpenCL support it ends up faster by a factor of ten.

AM1-press-productivity

In 3DMark 8 Fire Strike AMD scores 409, beating the Celeron G1610 with Nvidia G210 graphics in second place with 277 marks and the J2900 in third with 181 marks. Similar results are seen in Minecraft, render distance 8. AMD gets 57FPS, while the G1610/G210 rig gets 31FPS and the J2900 ends up with 25FPS.

It beats both Intel platforms by a ratio of two to one in Bastion, delivering 44FPS at 1920x180 with 4xAA. Pro Evolution Soccer 2014 is playable at 1080 medium, with 31FPS, with the G1610/G210 combo in second at 28FPS and the J2900 out of the running, as it could not complete the test. 

So far so good


As we pointed out in our brief AM1 review last week, we like the idea of a socketed entry-level platform. It makes a lot of sense in many markets and niches. Coupled with good pricing and performance, AMD should have no trouble attracting a wide range of customers, from enthusiasts who are looking for an affordable HTPC platform to average consumers, especially those in emerging markets such as China, India, Africa and Latin America.

We raised one concern in our review, if you can call it that – there are no aftermarket coolers for AM1 products just yet. However, AMD informed us that we should see some “interesting cooler choices” from Noctua and Streacom soon after the launch. This is good news for all those looking for silence, as we expect to see at least some passive coolers. In addition some AM1 boards feature a DC in connector and they will be happy to run off a passive brick charger.

Last modified on Wednesday, 09 April 2014 13:19
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments