Featured Articles

After USA Nvidia’s Shield comes elsewhere

After USA Nvidia’s Shield comes elsewhere

Project Shield, which is now called Nvidia Shield, is up for preorder, at least if you’re in North America. For…

More...
Nvidia won most Haswell high-end notebooks

Nvidia won most Haswell high-end notebooks

Our sources in the Far East are claiming that most Haswell notebooks that are coming out in the next few weeks…

More...
Microsoft officially announces the Xbox One

Microsoft officially announces the Xbox One

As announced earlier, Microsoft has now finally unveiled its next-generation console, the Xbox One. Although it did not shed much light…

More...
AMD poaches more Nvidia talent

AMD poaches more Nvidia talent

AMD has apparently managed to grab yet another high-ranking Nvidian, but this time it was no engineer or developer.

More...
HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

Today we’ll take a closer look at a factory overclocked HD 7790, courtesy of HIS. The HIS HD 7790 iCooler Turbo…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 11 July 2008 09:52

Electronic voting faulty in France

Written by Nick Farell

Image

Serious flaws


France's electronic voting system has been responsible for fudging the results of elections, according to a new study.

Chantal Enguehard, a member of the Laboratory of Computer Science, Nantes Atlantique, has been studying the results of electronic voting
for a year. She has discovered that polling locations which use electronic voting machines exhibit a higher number of discrepancies than those using conventional paper ballots.

Enguehard compared the results from more than 21,000 polling stations by comparing electoral registers, which voters sign after voting, with the total vote counts from machines and paper ballots in several elections.  She found that more than 30 percent of polling stations that use electronic voting machines produced strange results.

Enguehard ruled out user error because the margin of discrepancies increased in later elections when voters were already familiar
with the systems. The research was funding by the Ethical Citizen lobby group which called for better tools that will enable independent evaluators to to measure the quality and reliability of elections.

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments