Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 11 July 2008 09:52

Electronic voting faulty in France

Written by Nick Farell

Image

Serious flaws


France's electronic voting system has been responsible for fudging the results of elections, according to a new study.

Chantal Enguehard, a member of the Laboratory of Computer Science, Nantes Atlantique, has been studying the results of electronic voting
for a year. She has discovered that polling locations which use electronic voting machines exhibit a higher number of discrepancies than those using conventional paper ballots.

Enguehard compared the results from more than 21,000 polling stations by comparing electoral registers, which voters sign after voting, with the total vote counts from machines and paper ballots in several elections.  She found that more than 30 percent of polling stations that use electronic voting machines produced strange results.

Enguehard ruled out user error because the margin of discrepancies increased in later elections when voters were already familiar
with the systems. The research was funding by the Ethical Citizen lobby group which called for better tools that will enable independent evaluators to to measure the quality and reliability of elections.

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments