Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 09 December 2013 12:31

US Supremes to rule on software patents

Written by Nick Farrell



Industry holds its breath

The highest court in the US will rule if it is possible to patent software and open the way for new breed of trolls to suck the marrow out of the industry. The Supreme Court agreed it will rule on the divisive issue of what kinds of software are eligible for patent protection. The court's decision may prove key to deciding under what circumstances companies can be sued for using certain software in their products.

The case was bought by Alice Corporation, which holds a patent for a computer system that facilitates financial transactions. The patent is challenged by CLS Bank International. Companies including Google, HP, Facebook and Netflix have signalled their interest in the issue by asking the court to hear the WildTangent case.

Some legal experts, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital civil liberties group, say that courts are too keen to uphold patents on ideas that are too vague to deserve protection. Such vague patents can be used against big tech companies, which say they are forced to spend money defending lawsuits instead of investing in research and development. Google does not want too much software protection, others, like IBM prefer that most software be patent eligible.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which has primary responsibility for interpreting patent law has not come up with a test that judges can use to review software patent claims. If the Supreme Court rules on it, it will give Judges greater clarity. The case will decide how innovative an invention should have to be to receive legal protection. An invention related to an abstract idea can be patented, but it must include a way of applying the idea. Word on the street is that the Judges are expected to say that software patents were not patent eligible.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments