Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 05 December 2013 11:28

Online adverts could be illegal

Written by Nick Farrell



No more going native

A growing online usage of ads designed to blend in with the rest of a website's content may be illegal in some instances, according to the US watchdog the Federal Trade Commission. Dubbed “native advertising," the practice is being adopted by online publishers and makes "advertorial" and infomercials look like real content. Native advertising was long banned from print media because Journalists and Editors felt it damaged their credibility. Now that no one has any credibly anymore the advertising departments are pressuring for a return of advertising copy which looks like real news.

FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez said while native advertising may certainly bring some benefits to consumers, it has to be done lawfully," she said. "By presenting ads that resemble editorial content, an advertiser risks implying, deceptively, that the information comes from a non-biased source." If the FTC does make a stand on the issue then Buzzfeed.com will be stuffed. Among the content on the website recently was a list of "13 dogs who get an A for effort," sponsored by the pet food brand Purina Pro Plan, and a list of "15 Creative Snowmen That Will Blow Your Mind," sponsored by Columbia Sportswear.

Fortunately, Ramirez said the FTC was not contemplating specific regulations to deal with the issue in the online space. That would involve taking on big corporations in the interest of the consumer and that is not what US regulators are supposed to do.

In June of this year, the commission sent letters to certain search engine companies, which it did not name, urging them to ensure that they carefully distinguish search results from paid advertisements. The FTC also went after a company that used fake news sites to sell acai berry weight loss products, using logos like "One trick of a tiny belly" and similar come-ons.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments