Featured Articles

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD is fast tracking stacked DRAM deployment and a new presentation leaked by the company  points to APUs with stacked DRAM,…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel has introduced seven new Haswell mobile parts and four Bay Trail SoC chips, but most of them are merely clock…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

Today we'll take a closer look at AMD's A8-7600 APU Kaveri APU, more specifically we'll examine the GPU performance you can…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 15 November 2013 09:20

Intel forced AMD to adopt SDP metric

Written by Nermin Hajdarbegovic



If you can’t beat them, join them

Earlier this week AMD added Beema and Mullins to its mobile roadmap and the decision to ditch the good old TDP metric for Mullins parts raised quite a few eyebrows.

SDP, or Scenario Design Power was used in lieu of TDP. Of course, SDP is not AMD’s invention. It was introduced by Intel a couple of years ago and used for its ultra low power parts, miraculously shaving off a few watts with the strike of a pen. Intel adopted the new metric to make its chips seem a tad more competitive compared with ARM SoCs.

Now AMD is doing the same in an effort to level the playing field and make Mullins look more competitive compared with Intel chips.

“We had to adapt to using an SDP measure for Mullins so our power did not appear dramatically higher than Intel’s low-power SDP figures,” AMD told us.

AMD pointed out that it's not hiding the TDP of Mullins, it is just playing by the rules set by the competition, as it cannot afford to be perceived as less efficient simply because Intel refuses to use TDP. Unlike Intel, AMD will use both numbers for upcoming ultra-low power parts.

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments