Featured Articles

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD is fast tracking stacked DRAM deployment and a new presentation leaked by the company  points to APUs with stacked DRAM,…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel has introduced seven new Haswell mobile parts and four Bay Trail SoC chips, but most of them are merely clock…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

Today we'll take a closer look at AMD's A8-7600 APU Kaveri APU, more specifically we'll examine the GPU performance you can…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 06 November 2013 11:45

Tom's finds retail R9 290X card runs much slower

Written by Fuad Abazovic



Than press cards

There is a big thing going on right now at Tom's Hardware and Tech Report and our readers appear to have joined the fun. It turns out that a couple of Tom’s Hardware guys, our buddies Chris Angelini and Igor Wallossek, have found out that the retail Radeon R9 290X runs much slower than the press card everyone got.

We are in the middle of the Radeon R9 290X testing against an Nvidia card that is launching tomorrow and we have also noticed that Radeon R9 290X performance fluctuates. Tom's and Techreport have reported that the clock speed goes down to just 727MHz in some instances.

We can confirm that our card during testing went down as low as 744MHz, sometimes even less, but only in normal bios mode. In Uber mode it would be much more constant at around 1000MHz scoring 16 percent faster score Sleeping dog game and 2560x1600. You can check our scores here

As you can see in our graph, in Normal mode the card worked under 800MHz most of the time and quickly reached 94 degrees Celsius. The picture below shows that in the same game, Sleeping Dogs, the card worked at around 900+ MHz, reaching its maximum temperature of 95 degrees Celsius relatively quickly.

r290xtemp-down-small

For larger picture click here.

Tom’s Hardware tested a retail card and found a huge performance gap which could indicate that they got a card that could not kick in Uber mode, had a faulty, wrong BIOS, or worse. Of course the worst case scenario would be that the press cards were intentionally meant to be faster than the retail cards, and having retail cards running as much as 20 percent slower than press cards would point to one of the biggest feats of cheating of all times, at least as far as the GPU industry goes.

Tech Report got a reply from AMD that they are investigating the issue, they say Tom’s results are “uncharacteristic” got and that there will be a driver update to minimize the fluctuations. AMD promised to send an update shortly and we will try to get to the bottom of it.

We have tried to get a hold of a retail card, but needless to say, they are impossible to get in our region, they are sold out. We urge our readers to test 3Dmark or any other game if they got Radeon R9 290X and email it to us, or leave in comments. We want to compare our scores with your scores to try to get to the bottom of this.

Make sure you read the original review here, and the story here.



Last modified on Wednesday, 06 November 2013 12:14
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments