Featured Articles

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel has revealed an update to its CPU roadmap and some things have changed in 2015 and beyond. Let’s start with the…

More...
Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

We broke the news of Nvidia's ambitious gaming tablet plans back in May and now the Shield tablet got a bit…

More...
Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia has announced its first Android tablet and when we say Nokia, we don’t mean Microsoft. The Nokia N1 was designed…

More...
Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell is better known for its storage controllers, but the company doesn’t want to give up on the smartphone and…

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 17 June 2008 12:16

Spammer told to pay MySpace

Written by Nick Farell

Image

Anti-social networking


Media Breakaway and its Chief Executive, Scott Richter, have been told to pay the social networking giant, MySpace, $4.8 million in damages and $1.2 million in legal fees. The company's employees were also ordered to stay off MySpace for running phishing attacks and sending unsolicited messages to MySpace users.

Richter, who once paid $7 million to Microsoft to settle a lawsuit that accused him of sending illegal spam, got off lightly. The court-appointed arbitrator said much of the spamming activity was the fault of Media Breakaway's partners. They send traffic to sites owned by advertisers who pay Media Breakaway for the leads or sales, according to Court documents.

Another reason for the 'lighter fine' is that  Media Breakaway has made efforts to comply with the law, such as making affiliates sign anti-phishing agreements. However, some of the affiliates either ignored or were not aware of the agreements, the arbitrator wrote.
 
More here.
Last modified on Tuesday, 17 June 2008 19:16

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments