Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 17 June 2008 12:16

Spammer told to pay MySpace

Written by Nick Farell

Image

Anti-social networking


Media Breakaway and its Chief Executive, Scott Richter, have been told to pay the social networking giant, MySpace, $4.8 million in damages and $1.2 million in legal fees. The company's employees were also ordered to stay off MySpace for running phishing attacks and sending unsolicited messages to MySpace users.

Richter, who once paid $7 million to Microsoft to settle a lawsuit that accused him of sending illegal spam, got off lightly. The court-appointed arbitrator said much of the spamming activity was the fault of Media Breakaway's partners. They send traffic to sites owned by advertisers who pay Media Breakaway for the leads or sales, according to Court documents.

Another reason for the 'lighter fine' is that  Media Breakaway has made efforts to comply with the law, such as making affiliates sign anti-phishing agreements. However, some of the affiliates either ignored or were not aware of the agreements, the arbitrator wrote.
 
More here.
Last modified on Tuesday, 17 June 2008 19:16

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments