Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 07 August 2013 09:31

Press attempts to respin Apple’s greatest disaster

Written by Nick Farrell

Spinning victory from defeat

On the anniversary of what is credited as one of Jobs’ Mob’s greatest disasters, there are moves in the Tame Apple press to tell us that the Apple Newton did not really suck at all. The Apple Newton is one of those toys which has gone down in history as being legendarily pants, along with Vista, the Kin, Zune, the HP TouchPad, and the Edsel.

On the anniversary of the release of the lemon, Wired is now trying to convince us that it was really a tablet and that it was ahead of its time. Firstly it was not a tablet, it was similar to other PDAs which were on the market at the time. It could take notes, store contacts, and manage calendars. You could use it to send a fax. Its main gimmick was that it could translate handwriting into text. It had the same ability to do this that Apple’s Siri has at finding an abortion clinic and Apple’s mapping gear to find an Apple store.

Apple had problems fitting all the parts into what it called a “dark, sleek and sculpted aesthetic” and the rest of the world called a small black tombstone. Wired blames Doonesbury for harming the Newton’s image. The comic ran a series on great Newton translating disasters. The reality was that this was one toy that Steve Jobs hated and he wanted it dead.

Jobs did not like it because of its poor performance and the fact it needed a stylus. Also he had nothing to do with the project which was invented by someone else. The moment he got the company back he killed the project stone dead. That should have been the end of it, but it seems Wired wants us to remember this turkey fondly.

It claims that if it had not been for the Newton, the ARM processor would not have taken off. It claims that many of the concepts that were in the Newton were adapted by modern tablets. That is, of course rubbish. The Newton was a souped up PDA of which there were loads of examples. Tablets were developed by Microsoft which failed to market them in the same way that Apple did later. Newton did not add anything to the technology pool.

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments