Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 14 June 2013 10:36

Apple didn’t care about book pricing

Written by Nick Farrell

Best form of defence

An Apple executive has told a court that Jobs’ Mob did not really give a monkey's if publishers jacked the prices up of their books.

Prosecutors claim that that Apple set up a cartel with publishers to push up the prices of books. But Apple’s Eddy Cue said while he was not surprised when publishers increased prices for new and best-selling titles after Apple entered the e-books market he denied it was Jobs’ Mob’s fault. Cue said that he didn’t raise the prices, the publishers did.

Prosecutors claim that he was the "chief ringleader" of the conspiracy. Cue said that he was under a lot of pressure after former CEO Steve Jobs gave him approval in late 2009 to pursue an iBookstore for the iPad. Cue said he wanted to get the deal done so Jobs could see the iBookstore before he snuffed it. After talking with publishers, Apple instead went with a so-called agency model, in which publishers set the price and Apple received a 30 percent commission on sales.

They then pushed Amazon to also adopt the agency model, which prosecutors claimed Apple encouraged through a contract clause that would allow it to reduce prices on its bookstore if other retailers sold e-books cheaper. But the move caused prices for new and best-selling books to increase, the government contends. Amazon's shift to agency also contributed to its e-books market share falling to 45 percent in 2012, Morgan Stanley said in a February report.

Cue’s argument was that if there was a cartel operating then the publishers would have come up with deals faster and it would have been easier to negotiate.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments