Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 08 March 2013 10:46

SimCity launch shows hardware stupidity

Written by Nick Farrell



Not enough servers

EA games has totally screwed up the launch of Simcity by not having enough servers to run the game properly.

The game has been pulled from sale on Amazon after shedloads of user complaints. Now a the message boards of EA's SimCity studio Maxis indicates that servers are being added soon. The company has not helped its case by adopting the excuse first trademarked by Apple when something goes tits-up by claiming that the problem only effects a “small number of users.” In this case it is most users.

Since Tuesday, EA has pulled the servers offline, promised resolutions on the game's launch page, but still not managed to keep the game running. Part of the problem is that while SimCity has traditionally been a single-player game, the default mode of the new SimCity automatically connects a player's city to those of a handful of other players. This might seem like a good idea, it means that you have to have a network which can cope. EA didn’t. It also attempted to bake anti-piracy digital rights management (DRM) into the game which did not help.

All this meant was that EA needed shedloads of bullet proof servers that could handle the traffic and the DRM. It didn’t.

blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments