Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 25 January 2013 10:36

Germans say Internet crucial to life

Written by Nick Farrell



Federal court rules loss needs to be compensated


A German court has ruled that the Internet is an important commodity, and people should be compensated for the loss of it.

The German Federal Court of Justice has ruled that because having an internet connection is so significant for a large part of the German population, a customer whose service provider failed to provide connectivity between December 2008 and February 2009 is entitled to compensation. It is the first time a court ruled that an Internet connection is as important a commodity as having a phone.

The plaintiff was disconnected by mistake and demanded that the unnamed telecommunications company pay for costs that incurred in switching to a new provider. He wanted €50 per day for the period his was unable to use his DSL, fax over IP and VoIP services, according to the court. The Federal Court, however, awarded compensation only for loss of the internet connection. Compensation for the loss of a fax connection was denied.

This was because a fax only enables the user to send text and images faster than conventional mail and the technology is increasingly becoming irrelevant. While a phone connection is an important commodity, the plaintiff was also denied compensation for loss of his VoIP phone line since he owned a mobile phone.

Last modified on Sunday, 27 January 2013 09:54

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments