Featured Articles

Analyst reveals Apple Watch spec

Analyst reveals Apple Watch spec

An analyst has examined the Apple Watch supply chain in an effort to ascertain the exact spec of Cupertino’s new gadget…

More...
Nvidia's first 20nm product is a mobile SoC

Nvidia's first 20nm product is a mobile SoC

For much of the year we were under the impression that the second generation Maxwell will end up as a 20nm…

More...
Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Nvidia adjusts GTX 980 and GTX 970 pricing

Nvidia adjusts GTX 980 and GTX 970 pricing

It appears that Nvidia has been feeling the pulse of the market and took some note from comments regarding the original…

More...
PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

Today we will take a look at the PowerColor TurboDuo Radeon R9 285. The card is based on AMD’s new…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 12 December 2012 11:15

Intel launches server friendly Atom S1200

Written by Peter Scott

Gets roasted by AMD

Intel finally seems to be taking the micro server market seriously Chipzilla has introduced a new Atom family, designed specifically to power energy efficient servers.

Codenamed Centertron, the S1200 series is based on Intel’s 32nm Saltwell architecture and clocked between 1.6GHz and 2GHz. Unlike consumerish Atoms, dual-core Centertrons also feature server tech, such as VT virtualization, support for ECC memory and a total of eight PCIe lanes. Centertron also uses the new FCBGA1283 socket.

The entry level S1220 runs at 1.6GHz and features a TDP of 8.1W. The S1240 is a more efficient version, clocked at 1.6GHz, but with a 6.1W TDP. The S1260 hits 2GHz, but comes with an 8.6W TDP.

And now for some Intel bashing, courtesy of AMD and SeaMicro.

In an email fired off in response to Intel’s announcement, AMD blasts Intel for ignoring the micro-server “party” and wonders if the S1200 is “too little, too late.” It goes on to state that Intel refused to support SeaMicro in its bid to promote 64-bit dual-core Atoms. AMD (and SeaMicro) also bashed Intel for failing to gain much share in the tablet and smartphone markets.

It’s not like AMD is making a killing in said markets, but we guess all is fair in love and war.

You can check out the letter here.

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments