Featured Articles

Nvidia GTX 770 spec is out

Nvidia GTX 770 spec is out

In addition to the GK110 based Nvidia Geforce GTX 780, we managed to get some details regarding the GK104-based GTX 770…

More...
Nvidia Geforce GTX 780 detailed

Nvidia Geforce GTX 780 detailed

We managed to confirm the full spec of the upcoming Nvidia Geforce GTX 780 graphics card as well as some performance…

More...
AMD shares take rollercoaster ride

AMD shares take rollercoaster ride

In the last 52 weeks AMD was on a rollercoaster ride, with prices ranging from $1.81 to $6.46. Yesterday it closed…

More...
HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

Today we’ll take a closer look at a factory overclocked HD 7790, courtesy of HIS. The HIS HD 7790 iCooler Turbo…

More...
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 Generation 3 (32GB) reviewed

Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 Generation 3 (32GB) reviewed

High capacity USB drives have become commonplace a while ago, but although some memory outfits are peddling huge drives, up…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 30 October 2012 11:00

Big Content stuffs up six strikes law

Written by Nick Farrell



Tries to appoint one of its own henchmen to police it


A month before a “six strikes” anti-piracy plan goes live in the US the body reposible for policing it has been shown up as an RIAA sham. The Centre of Copyright Information (CCI) has become a  mockery after the RIAA failed to mention to its partners that the “impartial and independent” technology expert it was using lobbied for the music industry group.

Now the CCI is now considering whether it should hire another expert to evaluate the anti-piracy monitoring technology. The role is important because from next month the MPAA, RIAA and five major Internet providers in the United States will start punishing persistent BitTorrent pirates. The whole scheme is being run by the Center for Copyright Information (CCI) who agreed to hire an impartial and independent expert to review the evidence that will be used to accuse suspected subscribers.

But it turned out that the expert was Stroz Friedberg whose company was a former RIAA lobbying firm. The agreement between the copyright holders and ISPs requires him to be really independent. It is somewhat surprising that, of all the available companies, Stroz Friedberg's company was picked. It is also being seen as the RIAA attempting to spike the system with its own sockpuppet and a sign that neither the ISPs nor suspected pirates are going to see any justice in the system.

According to TorrentFreak the RIAA “had not informed” the participating Internet providers or CCI’s Executive Director Jill Lesser about this unfortunate relationship. Apparently the outfit was furious. It is thinking of hiring someone else to check his work, or just make his checking public on the very good grounds that the public will rip his skin off if he makes a bad call.

More here.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments