Featured Articles

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

We wanted to learn a bit more about Qualcomm's plans for wearables and it turns out that the company believes its…

More...
Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

We had a chance to talk to Michelle Leyden-Li, Senior Director of Marketing, QCT at Qualcomm and get an update on…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

Today we will take a look at the PowerColor TurboDuo Radeon R9 285. The card is based on AMD’s new…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 22 April 2008 09:52

New Jersey bans ISPs from handing over data

Written by Nick Farell

Image

Only with a subpoena


ISPs in New Jersey will not have to hand over personal data on anyone without a subpoena from the courts. New Jersey's State Supreme Court has decided that the State Constitution gives greater protection against unreasonable searches and seizures than the U.S. Constitution and has said that it takes priority.

Analysts say that the ruling is interesting because it shows a swing away from what was happening at a federal level. States seem to be doing more to protect Internet rights, while federal laws seem to be in favor of handing over data to whichever law enforcement body asks for it.

The ruling restricted police from obtaining the identity of a Cape May County woman accused of retaliating in 2004 against her boss. Coppers found the woman's identity by asking Comcast to hand over her IP address. Although the police obtained a subpoena for the data from a Municipal Court, higher courts said a grand jury subpoena was necessary because an indictable offense was at issue.

You can read the ruling here.
Last modified on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 19:30

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments