Featured Articles

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

We wanted to learn a bit more about Qualcomm's plans for wearables and it turns out that the company believes its…

More...
Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

We had a chance to talk to Michelle Leyden-Li, Senior Director of Marketing, QCT at Qualcomm and get an update on…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 22 April 2008 10:58

Should we XP or Vista?

Written by Nedim Hadzic

Image vs Image

Stick to the tried and true, or not?

 

It’s a heated debate these days, as some users are petitioning to keep XP around, whereas some analysts claim that Vista will make up 94% of global operating systems this year. What we need to do is just make up our minds on which OS is actually better. Do we really want Vista or is it being forced on us?

Yes, Vista will catch up, but let me remind you of one thing that I can’t stress enough – game publishers do not charge for betas, they’re tested, and tested again, until minimum requirements for pleasant gaming are achieved, and only then the game is released. And yes, I do know that there are numerous exceptions to this, since release versions are still worked on to fix some minor/major issues, but such releases are always frowned upon.

Microsoft, on the other hand, sells you a “fully functional version” (don’t you just love this phrase?) of an OS, so you get to pay up before you become a nice responsible user that will gladly help Microsoft in doing what they should have already done themselves – test their fricking OS!

 I remember installing XP when it came out, only to remove it a couple of days later. Why? Because it simply wouldn’t run my apps the way it should (or at all, for that matter). It was pure “eye-candy” and I reverted to Windows 98 in order to actually do some work. Oh yeah, and to this day I still use the “classic” Windows look.

So, Vista is here now, and to my eyes it’s nothing but a big bully trying to impose itself on as many systems as it can in order to get more beta testers. We, the end users, should not be so easily led to believe that these companies care about anything else but their “fully functional” bank accounts. XP will be forced out in order for you to do Microsoft’s job, because after all – no one does it better than your customers (just ask Creative).

By the time Vista catches up, XP will have been forgotten like its predecessors, but until that time comes, I’d like to do some serious work on a “fully functional” OS. Yeah you heard right, serious work, as opposed to staring at your screen and standing in awe of a revolutionary feature that allows you to see through your windows, while it makes you go out and buy more RAM in order to enjoy it some more. We might as well sacrifice brain tissue to see more shades of blue.

Oh yeah, and the next time you’re at the car dealer, ask him whether they offer any “fully functional” cars. The salesman’s look will tell you exactly why I laugh every time I hear that phrase.

Last modified on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 19:14

Nedim Hadzic

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments