Featured Articles

Microsoft officially announces the Xbox One

Microsoft officially announces the Xbox One

As announced earlier, Microsoft has now finally unveiled its next-generation console, the Xbox One. Although it did not shed much light…

More...
AMD poaches more Nvidia talent

AMD poaches more Nvidia talent

AMD has apparently managed to grab yet another high-ranking Nvidian, but this time it was no engineer or developer.

More...
Qualcomm and Samsung overtake AMD

Qualcomm and Samsung overtake AMD

It’s no secret that the mobile boom is taking a toll on makers of PC components and AMD is one of…

More...
Nvidia Geforce GTX 780 detailed

Nvidia Geforce GTX 780 detailed

We managed to confirm the full spec of the upcoming Nvidia Geforce GTX 780 graphics card as well as some performance…

More...
HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

Today we’ll take a closer look at a factory overclocked HD 7790, courtesy of HIS. The HIS HD 7790 iCooler Turbo…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 18 May 2012 09:54

Intel wants conflict free processors

Written by Nick Farrell



Will look elsewhere for minerals


Chipzilla has announced that it wants to use only conflict-free minerals to built its chips by 2013.

Intel had already promised that it would avoid using conflict minerals, and now it's tell the world+dog when that will happen. It wants to have at least one processor that's proven to be built with  gold, tantalum, tin and tungsten which come from conflict free regions.

Intel wants to reach the tantalum goal by the end of this year. The move is part of a wider array of environmental goals that should cut back on the energy use, power and water use by 2020. It means that the Haswell or Broadwell-based chips should not have caused anyone to suffer other than the designers.

blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments