Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 03 April 2008 10:29

Microsoft fails to fool India's tax man

Written by Nick Farell

Image

Bizarre excuse of the day


After much argie bargie, an Indian court has ruled that Microsoft will have to pay six years of back tax on its software licenses. For the last six years, Microsoft has argued that when it sells a license this should be tax-free profit.

Although Microsoft can appeal, it is starting to look like it will not succeed. The Appeals Commission in Delhi has ruled there is royalty involved in the software transaction, which is taxable. Tax officials said the company can now approach the Income-Tax Appellate Authority (ITAT) and the high court.

Between 1999-2004, Microsoft refused to pay tax in India, using claiming several loopholes including the double taxation avoidance agreement with the U.S. It also argued that since it flogged its software in India through a circuitous route involving several group companies, it counted as a sale rather than a royalty payment involved.

What sank Microsoft's case was the end-user agreement that said “the product is licensed, not sold.” Tax authorities cited this and said if the software is licensed, there has to be a royalty involved.

Royalty, under domestic law, is taxable at 15 per cent.
Last modified on Thursday, 03 April 2008 18:39

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments