Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 14 March 2012 10:47

Encyclopaedia Britannica is going out of print

Written by Nick Farrell



Out evolved by a fake penis expert


After 244 years, the Encyclopaedia Britannica is going out of print apparently out evolved by Wikipedia's crack team of fake penis experts.

The Encyclopaedia Britannica were once sold door-to-door by a fleet of travelling salesmen and were seen as a sign of intellectual knowledge within the middle class home. From now on Encyclopaedia Britannica will focus primarily on its online encyclopedias and educational curriculum for schools. The last print version is the 32-volume 2010 edition, which weighs 129 pounds and includes new entries on global warming and the Human Genome Project.

However with the Internet becoming the source of information, and it being updated daily, it is difficult for the  Encyclopaedia Britannica to compete. That is not to say that an online Britannica cannot compete with Wikipedia. For a start it is accurate, written by prestigious sources, has carefully edited entries and does not have an editorial team with a chip on its shoulders about who it thinks are important.

Our favourite editor who seemed to want to kill off ever entry related to us had an area of expertise listed as “fake penis expert.”

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments