Featured Articles

Apple iPad Air 2 costs $275 to build

Apple iPad Air 2 costs $275 to build

IHS has told Recode that the Apple iPad Air 2 16GB Wifi costs only $275 to build -- not bad…

More...
LG sells 16.8 million smartphones in Q3 14

LG sells 16.8 million smartphones in Q3 14

As Samsung is losing market share, another Korean company, which many had written off, is gaining.

More...
LG G Watch R EU price set at €299

LG G Watch R EU price set at €299

LG G Watch R is probably the best looking Android Wear device on the market and many have been waiting for…

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 14 March 2012 10:47

Encyclopaedia Britannica is going out of print

Written by Nick Farrell



Out evolved by a fake penis expert


After 244 years, the Encyclopaedia Britannica is going out of print apparently out evolved by Wikipedia's crack team of fake penis experts.

The Encyclopaedia Britannica were once sold door-to-door by a fleet of travelling salesmen and were seen as a sign of intellectual knowledge within the middle class home. From now on Encyclopaedia Britannica will focus primarily on its online encyclopedias and educational curriculum for schools. The last print version is the 32-volume 2010 edition, which weighs 129 pounds and includes new entries on global warming and the Human Genome Project.

However with the Internet becoming the source of information, and it being updated daily, it is difficult for the  Encyclopaedia Britannica to compete. That is not to say that an online Britannica cannot compete with Wikipedia. For a start it is accurate, written by prestigious sources, has carefully edited entries and does not have an editorial team with a chip on its shoulders about who it thinks are important.

Our favourite editor who seemed to want to kill off ever entry related to us had an area of expertise listed as “fake penis expert.”

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments