Featured Articles

Analyst reveals Apple Watch spec

Analyst reveals Apple Watch spec

An analyst has examined the Apple Watch supply chain in an effort to ascertain the exact spec of Cupertino’s new gadget…

More...
Nvidia's first 20nm product is a mobile SoC

Nvidia's first 20nm product is a mobile SoC

For much of the year we were under the impression that the second generation Maxwell will end up as a 20nm…

More...
Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Nvidia adjusts GTX 980 and GTX 970 pricing

Nvidia adjusts GTX 980 and GTX 970 pricing

It appears that Nvidia has been feeling the pulse of the market and took some note from comments regarding the original…

More...
PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

Today we will take a look at the PowerColor TurboDuo Radeon R9 285. The card is based on AMD’s new…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 15 February 2012 16:15

Intel is no longer a monopolist

Written by Nick Farrell

intel logo new

Last anti-trust case resolved

Chipzilla has finally ended a long cycle of defending itself against antitrust claims, with the last case against it finally dismissed.

The New York Attorney General dismissed the last antitrust suit against Intel which was filed in November 2009.  This complaint said that Chipzilla had bribed  or coercing computer makers to secure exclusive agreements for its computer chips.

The dismissal did not come without a price tag for Intel.  According to Law.com, Intel will have to write New York a cheque for $6.5 million to help cover some of New York's litigation costs. However it did not have to admit liability or alter its business practices.

A trial on the case had been scheduled to start today, but a ruling by Delaware federal district court judge Leonard Stark last December meant that it was better for both sides to settle. Stark decided that the state could not bring claims under the Donnelly Act, a state statute that allows for treble damages for injuries suffered by the state. This was because the allegations all involved injuries to private individuals and companies, rather than to state agencies or officials.
Other anti-trust claims were spiked under the statute of limitations.

It has been an expensive legal process for Intel. In 2008, South Korea's antitrust regulator hit Intel with a $25.4 million fine for anticompetitive behaviour against AMD. Next year the European Commission hit Intel with a record $1.45 billion fine for unfair competitive practices against AMD. In November 2009, Intel settled a lawsuit brought by the Federal Trade Commission, promising to change its business practices while not admitting liability.


Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments