Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 84

Featured Articles

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

We wanted to learn a bit more about Qualcomm's plans for wearables and it turns out that the company believes its…

More...
Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

We had a chance to talk to Michelle Leyden-Li, Senior Director of Marketing, QCT at Qualcomm and get an update on…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

Today we will take a look at the PowerColor TurboDuo Radeon R9 285. The card is based on AMD’s new…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:34

All chip companies are copycats

Written by


ImageImage

Column: The voice of IT experience


The similarities
between Intel’s Nehalem and the designs of AMD microprocessors are no coincidence – the grand daddy that spawned these chips is the Alpha microprocessor. This is a CPU that hovers between the living and the dead, and ironically is fabbed by Intel as part of a deal with the FTC made years ago.

There’s plenty of other ironies here. Dirk Meyer, who now holds a senior role at AMD, was part of the team which designed the Alpha in the early 1990s. The Alpha impressed the heck out of Paul Otellini when he was in a senior marketing position at Intel in the late 1990s – this was a chip that performed better in servers than its own Xeons and was owned by Compaq. The CEO of Compaq, Eckhard Pfeiffer, was far from pleased by Intel’s Inside campaign and in the mid 1990s there were many alternatives to the X86 CPU, including the Power PC, Sun’s SPARC chips, and even HP chips, which were fabbed by Intel and which led to the Itanium.

Ah yes, and the division of Motorola which worked on the Power PC was headed up by Hector Ruiz – we’ve all heard of him at AMD, right? Intel and AMD are distorted reflections of each other in the X86 House of Mirrors, which is found in the marketing pavilion of the semiconductor funfair.

We’ve tracked both Intel and AMD for nearly 20 years now and they’re like a divorced couple. They share custody of the X86 family for the sake of the kids, but deeply resent each other. They constantly bicker and snipe, bound together forever by the terms of the X86 divorce settlement imposed by a panel of judges.

They’re also copycats and always have been. In the past, AMD copied Intel designs  and now the boot, possibly temporarily, is on the other foot. Yet the stakes are not as high as they were even just a few years ago – the fanboi phase of the X86 wars is over, the vast majority of people using PCs don’t care which chip is inside their machines as long as it works. The war isn’t over – it’s just turned into a war where AMD makes guerilla strikes into territory regained by Intel.

And perhaps AMD’s last hope is that divine intervention, in the shape of the different court cases and government investigation, will put it in a position where it can do something better than make feeble incursions into X86land’s pocked landscape.

Mike Magee’s bog is at www.volesoft.com

Last modified on Wednesday, 19 March 2008 04:10

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments