Featured Articles

GTX 780 available in US stores

GTX 780 available in US stores

The GTX 780, a trimmed down version of the Geforce Titan, is out and we wrote that almost a dozen…

More...
Newegg claims Shield comes on June 30

Newegg claims Shield comes on June 30

It is no secret that for the last few days you can pre-order Nvidia Shield, at least if you are based…

More...
Prices of Xbox One/PS4 to be less than expected

Prices of Xbox One/PS4 to be less than expected

GameStop thinks that the fears of a very high launch price for the Xbox One and PlayStation 4 could be something…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the GTX 780

Nvidia officially launches the GTX 780

Just as we wrote a couple of days ago, Nvidia has picked the 23rd of May as the official launch date…

More...
HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

Today we’ll take a closer look at a factory overclocked HD 7790, courtesy of HIS. The HIS HD 7790 iCooler Turbo…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 27 December 2011 11:47

Intel Anti-Trust case goes to New York

Written by Nick Farell



If it can make it there it can make it anywhere


A federal judge in Delaware has cancelled a February 14 trial of an antitrust case filed against Intel.

New York state asked the court to allow its transfer to a New York state court because it can't  proceed in the court with its claim for damages under its state's laws. Judge Stark had on December 7 granted Intel's motion that some of the claims of New York state fell outside the statute of limitations, which is three years in antitrust cases in Delaware as compared to up to six years in New York state. The judge also disallowed a treble damages claim by New York on behalf of consumers under New York's Donnelly Act.

Intel had contended that the Donnelly Act does not authorise New York to bring a damages claim for harm done to private parties. New York will file in New York state court to seek whatever remedies are available to it there, Schneiderman said. New York claimed charged Intel with a systematic worldwide campaign of "illegal, exclusionary conduct" to maintain its monopoly power and prices in the market for x86 processors.

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments