Featured Articles

Core i5 3365M and Core i5 3325M in Q3 2012

Core i5 3365M and Core i5 3325M in Q3 2012

We wrote about the new Core i7 3525M that is supposed to arrive in Q3 2012 here, but it looks…

More...
Point of View/TGT GTX 680 Ultra Charged tested

Point of View/TGT GTX 680 Ultra Charged tested

It's a well known fact that the most popular graphics cards series usually had a few models that stood out and…

More...
Ivy Bridge Ultrabooks for Windows 7 and 8

Ivy Bridge Ultrabooks for Windows 7 and 8

All currently available Ultrabooks are based on the Huron River platform and 17W TDP dual-core 32nm Sandy Bridge processors and…

More...
Top of 17W Celeron range is 877

Top of 17W Celeron range is 877

We already mentioned upcoming Celeron 807 and Celeron 847 in the article below and these new 17W single and dual-cores are…

More...
Cooler Master HAF XM reviewed

Cooler Master HAF XM reviewed

Cooler Master introduced the new HAF XM on April 24. The company's HAF series is instantly recognizable, although the XM moniker…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 27 December 2011 09:56

Medfield performance leaked, looks impressive

Written by Peter Scott



Scares the beejeesus out of Qualcomm, Nvidia


Intel is slowly starting to hype up its new Medfield chip, a 32nm SoC that should find its way into next generation tablets and smartphones next year.

According to VR Zone, the new chip looks like a world beater and it is faster than current ARM chips with Nvidia and Qualcomm stickers on them. In fact, a 1.6GHz Medfield scores about 10,500 in Caffeinemark 3, ahead of the Tegra 2 and Snapdragon MSM8260, which score 7500 and 8000 respectively. However, it’s worth noting that Nvidia and Qualcomm already have faster chips on their hands, i.e. Tegra 3 and S4.

VR is reporting that other performance figures also look quite good and Medfield should be quite competitive. However, in terms of power consumption it still lags behind ARM players. The prototype consumes about 2.6W in idle and Intel hopes to hit 2W by the time Medfield is ready for production. In 720p Flash playback, Medfield consumes 3.6W, and the target is 2.6W.

So, on paper Intel’s first proper SoC looks pretty good, although power consumption could be, or rather has to be better. In case Intel fails to shave off a watt or two, it will probably have a hard time in the smartphone market, but Medfield looks like a decent enough processor for tablets.

More here.



blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments