Featured Articles

Nvidia GTX 770 spec is out

Nvidia GTX 770 spec is out

In addition to the GK110 based Nvidia Geforce GTX 780, we managed to get some details regarding the GK104-based GTX 770…

More...
Nvidia Geforce GTX 780 detailed

Nvidia Geforce GTX 780 detailed

We managed to confirm the full spec of the upcoming Nvidia Geforce GTX 780 graphics card as well as some performance…

More...
AMD shares take rollercoaster ride

AMD shares take rollercoaster ride

In the last 52 weeks AMD was on a rollercoaster ride, with prices ranging from $1.81 to $6.46. Yesterday it closed…

More...
HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

Today we’ll take a closer look at a factory overclocked HD 7790, courtesy of HIS. The HIS HD 7790 iCooler Turbo…

More...
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 Generation 3 (32GB) reviewed

Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 Generation 3 (32GB) reviewed

High capacity USB drives have become commonplace a while ago, but although some memory outfits are peddling huge drives, up…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 14 October 2011 08:36

Apple's patent trollage runs into sunlight

Written by Nick Farell



US court insists on proof before ban


Apple's attempt to create a tablet monopoly using patent troll tactics have failed in the United States after a Judge told the outfit to come up with a bit of proof.

While Judges in Germany and Australia have been happy to ban Samsung's Galaxy Tab while they wait for a full trial, in the US, Jobs' Mob has been told to sling its hook. U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh said that Samsung Electronic's Galaxy tablets might infringe Apple  iPad patents, but added that Apple has a problem establishing the validity of its patents. Judge Koh has yet to rule on Apple's request to bar some Galaxy products from being sold in the United States but with comments like that it indicates that Apple is unlikely to get the injunction it wants.

Apple's lawyers are going for injuctions because by the time that the legal mess is sorted out, the industry will have moved on and the products involved will be out of date. Apple now must show both that Samsung infringed its patents and that its patents are valid under the law while Samsung has to prove that there is some doubt about the validity of Apple's patents.

The Judge has indicated there are a lot in her mind already. Koh frequently remarked on the similarity between each company's tablets. At one point during the hearing, she held one black glass tablet in each hand above her head, and asked Sullivan if she could identify which company produced which.

"Not at this distance your honor," said Sullivan, who stood at a podium roughly ten feet away.

Koh did say she would deny Apple's request for an injunction based on one of Apple's so-called "utility" patents. She did not say whether she would grant the injunction based on three other Apple "design" patents.

More here.


Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments