Featured Articles

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia’s original Shield console launched last summer to mixed reviews. It went on sale in the US and so far Nvidia…

More...
AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

We had a chance to talk about AMD’s upcoming products with John Byrne, Chief Sales Officer, AMD. We covered a number…

More...
AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

We had a chance to talk to John Byrne who spent the last two years as Senior Vice President and Chief…

More...
OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OnePlus is one of the few small companies that might disrupt the Android phone market, dominated by giant outfits like Samsung.…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 04 October 2011 10:05

New 32nm Sandy Bridge Celerons in Q4 2011

Written by Fuad Abazovic


Intel mobile Celeron roadmap revealed
Intel’s mobile Celeron Bx00 series launched in Q2 and Q3 2011 depending on the SKU and Intel is getting ready to release new 32nm Sandy Bridge based Celeron processors.

The top of the platform dual-core V2 market segment remains the B840 dual-core with two treads and 1.9GHz core clock. This CPU has 35W TDP, 2MB cache, DDR3 1333MHz and graphics that run at 650/1000MHz. Top of the V1 dual-core market segment the one that comes to replace Celeron T3500 in Q4 2011 is called B800 and is clocked to 1.5 GHz.  The rest of the specs are the same, it is a 35W TDP processor, two cores and two threads, 2MB cache, DDR3 1333MHz and graphics that works at 650MHz with a max frequency set to 1000MHz.

There will be a new Sandy Bridge 32nm dual-core Celeron, the one that fits in Huron River platform called B815. It is expected as a head of dual core V1 market in Q1 2012 and it is a 1.6GHz 35W TDP CPU, has two cores and two threads, 2MB cache, DDR3 1333MHz and graphics 650/1050MHz. A faster successor could come in Q3 2012 at the earliest.

The kind of the single-core V1 Celeron market the one that replaces Celeron 925 is called Celeron B710 and is a single core 1.6GHz processor, has a single tread support, 35W TDP, 1MB of cache DDR3 1333 support as well as graphics set to 650/1000MHz. This is still a 35W part.

The successor to come in Q1 2012 is called B720 and this one works at 100MHz more, 1.7GHz to be precise, while the rest of the spec remains the same. These processors will maintain the Celeron market at least until Q3 2012.
Last modified on Tuesday, 04 October 2011 11:20
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
+3 #1 nt300 2011-10-04 16:24
Oh, boy, eough with the Celeron. Even AMD's Sempron is better than these crapy Celerons... Retire the bloody thing Intel and come out with something better...
 
 
0 #2 maroon1 2011-10-04 19:11
Quoting nt300:
Oh, boy, eough with the Celeron. Even AMD's Sempron is better than these crapy Celerons... Retire the bloody thing Intel and come out with something better...


Really ? Obviously you never saw any benchmarks for these SB-based celerons

Celeron G540 is much faster than even Athlon II X2 250
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/celeron-g540-g440.html

Retire what ?!! "Celeron" is just a name. Those newer celerons are based on sandy-bridge. The difference is that celeron has less features and lower L3 cache when compared to i3 21xx.
 
 
0 #3 Cartman 2011-10-05 06:59
well it can have good FPS but i would NEVER buy that damn thing only cuz name is still Celeron
It reminds me on dark times with Celeron on socket 478 i had like four of them.
I never could get money to buy Pentium 4 :), then i bought Athlon 64 later and felt like i had a rocket.
 
 
+1 #4 spp 2011-10-05 09:25
Celeron and sempron both are just socket caps at best :zzz .............
 
 
+3 #5 sss 2011-10-05 09:36
R.I.P to the following:

1.dan+mr.sucker=amdfagbots (Terminated)

2.Warrior24_7 (Defeated)

3.bro_fist (Eliminated)

:D :D :D :P :P :P
 
 
0 #6 Raider 2011-10-31 21:27
TDP of celerons is not enough to showoff, if celeron based CPU uses full power to start browser taking 10 seconds i would like more an AMD 65W CPU starting browser in 5s. Second, there must be a GPU in platform for smooth BANERS animation and FLASH and from what i know intel doesn't have any proper GPU to cut out CPU power-hungry calculations. Think people !
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments