Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 03 October 2011 12:59

Amazon sells Kindle Fire at a small loss

Written by


Hope to make money on content
Amazon’s Kindle Fire is the all the rage these days and according to IHS, Amazon is losing money on each tablet it manages to shift for $199.

The bill of material cost for the Fire is estimated at $191, just $8 less than the price, which means Amazon has a rather tight margin. However, if you add manufacturing and other costs, each Fire tablet sets Amazon back about $209.

Amazon hopes to recoup the loss in the long run, selling content to Fire users. With its vast content library, the concept makes sense. Of course, the BOM cost is also subject to change. Component costs tend to drop over time and if Amazon manages to ship a lot of tablets, prices should be lower, too.

Of course, Apple boasts and equally impressive content vault and it could do the same with its iPad. It just chooses not to.
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments