Featured Articles

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia’s original Shield console launched last summer to mixed reviews. It went on sale in the US and so far Nvidia…

More...
AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

We had a chance to talk about AMD’s upcoming products with John Byrne, Chief Sales Officer, AMD. We covered a number…

More...
AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

We had a chance to talk to John Byrne who spent the last two years as Senior Vice President and Chief…

More...
OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OnePlus is one of the few small companies that might disrupt the Android phone market, dominated by giant outfits like Samsung.…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 28 September 2011 11:00

Bethesda is serious about changing Scrolls

Written by Nick Farell
bethesda

We own it
It looks like games outfit Bethesda really is  serious getting the name of Mojang's upcoming Scrolls changed.

It filed a lawsuit it filed against the Minecraft developer this summer and Mojang's Markus Persson tried to pass the whole thing off as a joke. He challenged Behesda to a counter-strike tournament to sort it out.

Bethesda would have been better off doing so. It would have won and gained some good PR. Instead it has to go to court to fight over the use of the name Scrolls. Mojang's Scrolls, is collectible card/board game hybrid but Bethesda said that  it is confusingly similar with its Elder Scrolls trademark.

Persson Twittered yesterday that a court case was happening and the Scrolls case is going to court. Mojang business developer Daniel Kaplan confirmed to Gamasutra that they have been notified by Swedish court of the development.

Court documents show that Bethesda lawyers plan to use comments on Scrolls articles and videos from around the web to show how people will confuse Scrolls with The Elder Scrolls. It claims that Mojang has copied Bethesda because both Skyrim and Scrolls contain mountains. So does the United States but no one sues that for breach of trademark.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
0 #1 thematrix606 2011-09-28 11:45
Wow this article is written so bad and full of factual mistakes. Counter-strike? Serious getting the name Scrolls removed? Come on Nicky-boy.....

Fud fire him already, it's about time we get facts rather than science fiction.
 
 
+8 #2 nt300 2011-09-28 13:09
Bethesda relax for goodness sakes, let it go. If they used the whole name "Elder Scrolls" than yes hammer them in court, but just using Scrolls? Come on....
 
 
+1 #3 123s 2011-09-28 14:16
/facepalm
 
 
-1 #4 The HavoX 2011-09-28 15:28
OHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HH

Haters gonna hate
 
 
0 #5 seshysama 2011-09-28 15:54
I gotta agree with thematrix606. if you're gonna write an article, get your facts straight. it wasnt counter strike. the grammar is terrible. "it filed a lawsuit it filed..."
sloppy journalism...
 
 
0 #6 Th3pwn3r 2011-09-28 21:18
Bethesda is incomprehensibl y retarded.
 
 
0 #7 noel1993 2011-09-28 23:19
After Wikipedia, a scroll is a roll of papyrus, parchment, or paper which has been written, drawn or painted upon for the purpose of transmitting information or using as a decoration, going back thousands of years. On that basis Bell should suit Apple over the use of "phone" in iPhone. Americans and their Law are retarded...
 
 
0 #8 noel1993 2011-09-29 10:31
Oh, I'm sorry for my previous post! It wasn't sarcasm. I simply forgot You're in row with Wikipedia. Oh, I'm sorry! I shouldn't use word row: THQ could suit me for Saints' Row. That was sarcasm.
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments