Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 27 February 2008 07:19

Court of Appeals rules for inventor

Written by David Stellmack
Image

Inventor, 1: Microsoft, 0

A U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has sent a case back to the lower court that awarded damages to reconsider those damages. The lower court had ruled the Microsoft Corporation had infringed the patent spreadsheet of its Guatemalan inventor, Carlos Armando Amado, in its Office Suite applications. 

The lower court had awarded $.12 per copy to Amado but had not adequately explained how it arrived at the award or calculated it. At trial a jury ruled that Amado held the patent that links databases and spreadsheets, and that Microsoft had infringed it, awarding Amado $.04 per copy of Microsoft Office sold with the infringing software application. Upon appeal, the lower U.S. District Court tripled the damages to $.12 per copy sold.

Microsoft appealed again, and asked for damages at $.04 per copy; Amado asked for damages of $2.00 per copy. The Court of Appeals did not rule on the proper amount of damages, but sent the case back to the lower court, indicating that the damages should be “somewhere between $.04 and $2.00 per copy.”

And that’s no small award.

Read more here.

Last modified on Wednesday, 27 February 2008 07:39

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments