Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 25 May 2011 11:02

AMD E-350 vs Intel Atom D525+ION2 - Benchmarks

Written by Eliot Kucharik

E-350_vs_D525_ASRock_front_small top-value-2008-lr

Review:
Intel Atom is still dead




Benchmarks

Today we did the same benches as we did in the Sandy Bridge review. As you will see, especially the single thread performance of the Atom is about half of the E-350, but in multi-threaded applications the performance is quite on par, regardless of the 200MHz higher clock of the Atom. In the gaming department the ION2 and the Radeon 6310 are also on par, but only because the ION2 benefits from 512MB of dedicated DDR3 memory.

 

E-350_vs_D525_CB

 

E-350_vs_D525_CBogl

Of course the comparision with the i3-2100T is unfair, because here we used a Radeon HD6870.

 

E-350_vs_D525_lame

 

E-350_vs_D525_x264

 

E-350_vs_D525_rarenc

 

E-350_vs_D525_rardec

 

E-350_vs_D525_truecrypt

 

E-350_vs_D525_FarCry2

Because the FarCry2 bench did not allow for low settings in DX10, we had to settle for DX9 with Low/Low/Low and the rest of the settings are medium.

 

(Page 4 of 6)
Last modified on Saturday, 28 May 2011 00:13
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
+16 #1 bunker 2011-05-25 11:52
excuse me?

while i do like the benchmarks i don't like your conclusions AT ALL.
good thing you've added your results...

the E350 completely crushes both atoms in every benchmark other than dual threaded cinebench...

And i LOL'd at your conclusions the old atom uses 4Watts less in far cry. Sure, thats what the graph says, but the E350 accually doubles the 330's framrates. how can you honestly take that benchmark as a standard.

sigh...

maybe you should also add an efficiency score for far cry. that should be fun to watch you justify intel/nvidiass poor results there
 
 
+5 #2 Wolfesteinabhi 2011-05-25 12:03
AND YEAH this site clearly needs a PROOF READER! .. i read the sentence on first page thrice to understand that it actually is saying "512KB of Cache"

"The Atom D525 is clocked at 1.8GHz, has 2x 512MB 2nd Level Cache" LOL :D
 
 
+7 #3 The blue fox 2011-05-25 12:11
I don't understand Gaming bench marks on hardware like this. No one ever going to play games Other then Warcraft on this kind of hardware.
 
 
+8 #4 nele 2011-05-25 12:38
Quoting The blue fox:
I don't understand Gaming bench marks on hardware like this. No one ever going to play games Other then Warcraft on this kind of hardware.


Well it depends really... I'm getting a Fusion HTPC soon and since I'm not into console gaming (or any sort of gaming for that matter), I'm planning to install a few "oldies".

Of course, hardware won't be an issue for Worms or Angry Birds, but there's plenty of older games worth playing, for example some racing titles, fighting games, sports (mainly PES) - basically anything that can be fun with a couple of gamepads and a bunch of drunk people around...

I don't need a console, I just want to run some old, simple and silly games when I feel like it. :-)
 
 
+1 #5 eliot 2011-05-28 00:13
Quoting The blue fox:
I don't understand Gaming bench marks on hardware like this. No one ever going to play games Other then Warcraft on this kind of hardware.


LoL, in the last review I did not bother to include any games and many were outraged... So what is it what you want? If I do one game it's not ok, if I don't it's not ok either... make up your minds. ;-)
 
 
0 #6 eliot 2011-05-28 00:18
Quoting bunker:
excuse me?

while i do like the benchmarks i don't like your conclusions AT ALL.
good thing you've added your results...

the E350 completely crushes both atoms in every benchmark other than dual threaded cinebench...

And i LOL'd at your conclusions the old atom uses 4Watts less in far cry. Sure, thats what the graph says, but the E350 accually doubles the 330's framrates. how can you honestly take that benchmark as a standard.

sigh...

maybe you should also add an efficiency score for far cry. that should be fun to watch you justify intel/nvidiass poor results there


two week CPUs or CPU vs APU does not crash each other... While in WinRAR the difference is noticable (as a user) in any other application you won't notice. So there is no crushing involved. Crushing maybe a word to choose for the single-threaded performance which is still more important nowadays because most software besides games don't bother to utilize that potential. And something like Photoshop is a bit too much for such CPUs either. Even the x264 was just for the fun of it, not really to suggest to any user to do any encoding with it ;-)
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments