Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 17 May 2011 14:00

Gainward GTX 560 Phantom reviewed - 6. Test results

Written by Sanjin Rados
phantom-thumbtop-value-2008-lr

Review: Where did the 'Ti' go? 


3DMark 2011

3DMark 2011 is the new Futuremark synthetic test that has proven to be pretty realistic when it comes to estimating the graphics cards' punch. The benchmark rated out test subject, the GTX 560 Phantom, as slower than GTX 560 Ti by 8-12 percent. Our gaming tests will reveal that 3DMark 2011 was right on the money. Also, we see that the GTX 560 Phantom is up to 17-21 faster than the GTX 460 1GB.mark2011

 

(Page 6 of 12)
Last modified on Saturday, 04 June 2011 20:44
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments