Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 11 February 2008 11:33

Realplayer baffled over zero-day flaw claim

Written by

Image

Gleg refuses to spill the beans


Months
after it first revealed a zero-day flaw in Real Player, Russian security company Gleg is refusing to tell anyone how to fix it.

According to Daniweb, Gleg's Evgeny Legerov revealed the zero-day exploit but seems unwilling or unable to provide the necessary data to allow the alleged gaping security hole to be patched. Gleg has been approached several times by RealNetworks and CERT, but has only posted a video showing the heap overflow/code execution exploit in action.

The company is being hounded by others in the IT industry for not handing over details. It means that Gleg customers get client side exploit information before the vendor can patch it. Legerov claims that the exclusivity is required so that his customers can better understand the level of risk that they face.

More here.
Last modified on Monday, 11 February 2008 20:06

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments