Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 28 March 2011 11:04

Study shows that piracy did not hinder quality new music

Written by Nedim Hadzic
y_disc

Quite the contrary
You’ve seen the scenario countless times – music industry sounds all bells alarming people that quality new music is doomed in this anti-creative and pirate-ridden world. However, a study by economist Joel Waldfogelm shows that rise of file sharing has not had a negative impact on creation of quality new music and artists, quite the contrary, and ultimately reveals the reason for the real reason behind the industry’s inquisitions.

The study ran a comprehensive statistical analysis by crunching numbers from charts and amount of albums that exceed certain quality thresholds and ultimately concluded that pre-Napster and post-Napster periods in no way support the industry’s claims. In fact, it turns out that creative output has actually increased with the rise of file sharing whereas the quality pretty much remained the same.

Furthermore, the study yielded some interesting results that may point at just why the industry is clutching at straws. Namely, the only actual difference prior to and after Napster saga is the rise of independent labels and indie artists.

It indeed makes sense – seeing how major labels squeeze out the last bit of cash from what was once considered to be art, the big boys are in no way interested to see their profits decline. Thus, they resort to hollow arguments in order to gain “moral” justification for stripping individuals of centennial earnings before courts, acting like crusaders of creativity in the process.

We must admit, it’s pretty mind-boggling to see the music industry in its current shape propone creativity. An uninformed (or deaf?) person would think that major labels are the only thing that stands between today and a sad, creativeless and artless world. Unfortunately, one needn’t be hearing endowed to review the artists lists on these creative-crusader major labels, and the real truth of why cash has taken precedence over art lies therein.


Last modified on Monday, 28 March 2011 12:16

Nedim Hadzic

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments