Featured Articles

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia’s original Shield console launched last summer to mixed reviews. It went on sale in the US and so far Nvidia…

More...
AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

We had a chance to talk about AMD’s upcoming products with John Byrne, Chief Sales Officer, AMD. We covered a number…

More...
AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

We had a chance to talk to John Byrne who spent the last two years as Senior Vice President and Chief…

More...
OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OnePlus is one of the few small companies that might disrupt the Android phone market, dominated by giant outfits like Samsung.…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 14 February 2011 12:11

Tegra 2 game looks better

Written by Fuad Abazovic



MWC 2011: See for yourself

The Galaxy on Fire 2 demo we saw at Nvidia's booth can show you the difference between Tegra 2 and some other graphics solutions on the same game.

Without further delays we can easily tell you that Tegra 2 game can enable some quite good looking shaders that simply looks better than the shaders on some other phones, eg Samsung Galaxy S that runs PowerVR graphics.

Nvidia wants to makes shaders matter and games looks better on Tegra 2. Here is the comparison first picture is with Tegra 2 optimisation on, and below is Tegra 2 shaders off.

galaxieonfire500

galaxieonfire_tegraoff500

Last modified on Monday, 14 February 2011 13:32
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
-7 #1 63jax 2011-02-14 13:07
this dude has an orgasm when writing or talking about nVidia. he has an altar dedicated to it...
 
 
-33 #2 Dribble 2011-02-14 13:29
I see no pictures
 
 
+20 #3 nele 2011-02-14 13:33
Sorry guys, we had an issue with the engine, didn't render the pics in some browsers. Should be ok now.
 
 
-23 #4 dan 2011-02-14 13:38
They both look shit. Typical Nvidia.
 
 
-25 #5 HiTechpro 2011-02-14 14:38
in contrast to AMD who have only done bad things the last year

then it goes really well for the good old nVidia, nice :-)
 
 
+27 #6 Sodomy 2011-02-14 14:58
Quoting HiTechpro:
in contrast to AMD who have only done bad things the last year


wouldn't say bad, just average in the GPU department (which is a let down after the 4/5000 GPUs).
 
 
+11 #7 Coliz91 2011-02-14 15:17
It's quite contemporary gen lo0king graphics for a small chip....n0w,let tegra 3 fl0urished n bring far better features..crysis2 playable mayb?? :lol: :D
 
 
+12 #8 123s 2011-02-14 16:03
Quoting HiTechpro:
in contrast to AMD who have only done bad things the last year

then it goes really well for the good old nVidia, nice :-)
Huh ? Wasnt it NV with hyped up Fermi that took 1 year from uberfail to decent ?
 
 
-11 #9 nt300 2011-02-14 19:32
No offence but NVIDIA's Tegra 2 is a bunch of BS. The demo run by Tegra 2 has the PQ settings completely MAXED for ultra high quality Picture Quality where as the other graphics solution has it way way low.

It's another NVIDIA strategy trying to mislead people into thinking Tegra 2 looks better where in fact it does not...
 
 
+8 #10 nt300 2011-02-14 19:34
Nice to see people posting baseless info due to NV fanboyism.
Hey this isn't the 1970's, Welcome to 2011 where AMD's Radeon department ruled the nest for several years now.
Quoting HiTechpro:
in contrast to AMD who have only done bad things the last year

then it goes really well for the good old nVidia, nice :-)
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments