Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 24 January 2008 07:07

AT&T still on the fence about filtering

Written by David Stellmack
Image

Undecided about examining network traffic


AT&T is still trying to make up its mind if it wants to start examining traffic on its network in an attempt to try to curb the use of its network in illegal sharing of copyrighted material. Comcast has a full scale revolt on its hands over its use of traffic shaping and filtering, and if AT&T chooses to head down this path they too could wind up with a lot of angry consumers.

While CEO, Randall Stephenson, is quoted as saying, “It’s like being in a store and watching someone steal a DVD,” the bottom line is that not all peer-to-peer traffic is being used for illegal purposes.

The bigger issue is whether an Internet Service Provider has the right to block traffic to sites that it thinks are engaged in illegal purposes. Should your ISP act as big brother to determine what content is acceptable and what is not? This is something that is not going to be settled in the short term. Look for the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) to challenge an ISP’s big brother abilities in the near future.

Read more here.

Last modified on Thursday, 24 January 2008 09:09

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments