Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 12 November 2010 08:54

Industry sources denying Apple with AMD APUs

Written by Fuad Abazovic
appleamd

Intel only for now

Updated: Someone much closer to the core has confirmed that AMD has the deal with Apple about fusion here.

It doesn’t
matter how you call them, CPUs or APUs and if you put graphics on the same chip or in a chipset, our industry sources are suggesting that Apple at this time only wants Intel's CPUs.

Apple was not too happy about Nehalem and Arrandale chips for its ultra transportable notebook market due to their higher power consumption, but again at this time it doesn’t plan to launch any Fusion or other AMD processor based products. At least not in the near future. Arrandale Core i3, Core i5 got to Mac book pros but not in smaller notebooks like Air who is still stuck with Core 2 Duo. 

Apple will continue to use AMD graphics, as an alternative to its Nvidia GPU offering but that’s it. The dream to see Apple with Fusion (Ontario, Zacate, Llano) chips inside is over, at least for the time being. Don’t give up the hope, Apple is known to adopt new partners and technologies, as long as they are significantly better than the competition. Just remember how Intel won against IBM PowerPC CPUs. It took Intel years to get there but now PowerPC is completely replaced by Intel as Intel got things right.

The Sandy Bridge monolithic core looks like a decent “Fusion” product and Optimus works just fine, so we don’t see much space for AMD CPUs or APUs. At this time AMD would probably give its chips below cost just to claim that it got in Apple, but Jobs is well aware of that, and doesn’t like when companies are using Apple for its cause. He just care about marking profits for its company. Cudos to that cause.

AMD also denied the suggestion that they won the deal with Apple as probably Apple wanted to kill such talk as soon as possible. Let's hope that AMDs Executive Vice presidents will be a bit more clear next time they show an Apple picture.

Also read

Apple to embrace AMD Fusion?

http://www.fudzilla.com/processors/item/20817-apple-to-embrace-amd-fusion
Last modified on Friday, 12 November 2010 16:42
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
-29 #1 AndromedaB 2010-11-12 11:07
intel right now is way better than amd performance wise period. i think apple should stick to intel for its medium-high end offerings for now. it would be awesome seeing something low end or a netbook like a macbook air with fusion+ion though (or sandy bridge for that matter but fusion would probably be a lot cheaper)
 
 
+27 #2 Shurik_tambourine 2010-11-12 11:08
In the past the only reason I hated macs was because they didn't use AMD processors
 
 
+6 #3 Haberlandt 2010-11-12 16:41
No worries. Sooner or later is going happen eventually.
 
 
+5 #4 zhfac 2010-11-12 20:50
"At this time AMD would probably give its chips below cost just to claim that it got in Apple, but Jobs is well aware of that, and doesn’t like when companies are using Apple for its cause. He just care about marking profits for its company. Cudos to that cause."

So does this mean Intel isn't using Apple? Can't believe this was even written.
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments