Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 13 October 2010 11:52

Leadtek rolls out cooler GT 430

Written by Slobodan Simic
leadtek

At least on paper

Leadtek has followed the rest of the Nvidia partners with its own version of the GF108-based GT 430 card, the WinFast GT 430. Although it appears that this card simply isn't much different than the reference one, Leadtek claims that it has up to 10% lower GPU temperature.

The card features the same low profile PCB that we've seen on the reference card, works at 700MHz for the GPU, 1400MHz for those 96 CUDA cores, and 1800MHz for 1GB of DDR3 memory paired up with a 128-bit memory interface. The backplate feature D-Sub, DVI and HDMI outputs, and if you ask us, it's just another GT 430.

The price hasn't been announced but we guess it should fall in line with the rest of the GT 430 cards on the market.

winfast_Gt430_1
Last modified on Wednesday, 13 October 2010 12:20
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
+4 #1 Nerdmaster 2010-10-13 13:35
460 is better than 5830.
450 is on par with 5770.
430 is even worse than 5670.
So it is the biggest failure as far as i am concerned.
 
 
0 #2 MrScary 2010-10-13 14:31
This piece of crap remind me back when i had a pentium 3 with a rubish S3 installed, what a joke of VGA, a very good one from the green gobling jester.
 
 
0 #3 MrScary 2010-10-13 14:32
Quoting Nerdmaster:
460 is better than 5830.
450 is on par with 5770.
430 is even worse than 5670.
So it is the biggest failure as far as i am concerned.

In fact is worse than the ultra cheap 5570, so figure out how bad it is...
 
 
0 #4 Colwynstein 2010-10-13 16:49
Wouldn't the 430 be adequate for using it as a stand alone physx card?
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments