Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 30 July 2010 07:22

XFX HD 5670 1GB tested - 4. Testbed

Written by Sanjin Rados
thumb2

Review: Good bundle at a discount




Testbed:
Gainward GTX 460 Golden Sample Goes Like Hell 1GB
HD 5750 512MB
HD 5750 1GB
EVGA GTX 460 768MB (675MHz/3600)
XFX HD 5670 775M 1GB
Sapphire HD 5670 1GB

Motherboard: EVGA 4xSLI
CPU: Core i7 965 XE (Intel EIST and Vdrop enabled)
Memory: 6GB Corsair Dominator 12800 7-7-7-24
Harddisk:   OCZ Vertex 2 100 GB
Power Supply: CoolerMaster Silent Pro Gold 800W
Case: CoolerMaster HAF X
Fan Controler: Kaze Master Pro 5.25"
Operating System: Win7 64-bit
258.80_desktop_win7_winvista_64bit_english
10.6 CCC

(Page 4 of 9)
Last modified on Friday, 30 July 2010 10:58
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
+11 #1 BernardP 2010-07-30 15:42
Interesting comments, but comparing the HD 5670 with much faster cards, such as GTX 460, is meaningless.

Comparisons should be mostly made with cards in the same price range.

NVidia GT240 and GT220 should have been included
 
 
-3 #2 spede 2010-07-31 07:42
Typical Fuad. ATI low end card gets compared with GTX460 and similar. No wonder ATI doesn't want to send samples to this site.
 
 
+1 #3 JAB Creations 2010-08-01 09:20
This should have been tested on a nice socket AM3 system or a socket 1156. Really, who with a system like that would buy this kind of card?

It is a nice card for the price, single slot, XFX warranty, etc. It's on par with an 8800GT if you want to compare it to any sort of high end video card.

This card is for casual gamers who should not expect decent FPS even at 1680x1050 with all the eye candy turned on however for those who don't care a couple of these in Crossfire should play most games at default settings at a reasonable FPS.
 
 
-3 #4 SiliconDoc 2010-08-03 07:18
Another piece of ati crap that 5 year old NVidia G80 and derivatives technology stomps into the dirt.

I see they want $100 on the egg, when a 9800GT beats the crap out of it for $75, includes PhysX and Cuda and OpenCL out of the box, and plays games WELL.

ATI - Stuff the crashing artifacting driver plagued piece of crap ati card in the trash bin and stop the living nightmares for the end users.
Thanks you lame losers.
 
 
0 #5 blandead 2010-08-13 06:56
troll/bash #8, it doesn't end..
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments