Featured Articles

After USA Nvidia’s Shield comes elsewhere

After USA Nvidia’s Shield comes elsewhere

Project Shield, which is now called Nvidia Shield, is up for preorder, at least if you’re in North America. For…

More...
Nvidia won most Haswell high-end notebooks

Nvidia won most Haswell high-end notebooks

Our sources in the Far East are claiming that most Haswell notebooks that are coming out in the next few weeks…

More...
Microsoft officially announces the Xbox One

Microsoft officially announces the Xbox One

As announced earlier, Microsoft has now finally unveiled its next-generation console, the Xbox One. Although it did not shed much light…

More...
AMD poaches more Nvidia talent

AMD poaches more Nvidia talent

AMD has apparently managed to grab yet another high-ranking Nvidian, but this time it was no engineer or developer.

More...
HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

Today we’ll take a closer look at a factory overclocked HD 7790, courtesy of HIS. The HIS HD 7790 iCooler Turbo…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Sunday, 18 April 2010 14:33

GTX480 is one power sucking monster - 8. Lost Planet

Written by Eliot Kucharik

Image

Review: Win XP 32-bit vs Win7 64-bit











Lost Planet

This was one of the first games with DX10 support. Sadly with the ATI cards, the DX10 benchmarks fails to run with an odd error. So we had no choice to run the test with DX9 under Windows 7 with ATI’s cards. The GTX480 did not have that problem, so we could run it in DX10 mode, but as expected the performance slowed down considerably, so it can't be compared against ATI here. In Windows XP we could set the resolution for the HD4850 to 720p and with the HD5850/GTX480 to 1080p. All cards are set to AA x4, AF x8 and all other settings as high as possible. In Windows 7 the bench did not let us choose 1080p, the maximum we could set was 1600x1200, and the rest of the settings remained the same. The fps remained quite the same on the ATI cards, but they had to render 153.6k Pixel less.

Image


Image


(Page 8 of 10)
Last modified on Friday, 24 September 2010 20:31
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments