Featured Articles

LG G Watch R ships in two weeks

LG G Watch R ships in two weeks

The LG G Watch R, the first Android Wear watch with a truly round face, is coming soon and judging by…

More...
LG unveils NUCLUN big.LITTLE SoC

LG unveils NUCLUN big.LITTLE SoC

LG has officially announced its first smartphone SoC, the NUCLUN, formerly known as the Odin.

More...
Microsoft moves 2.4 million Xbox Ones

Microsoft moves 2.4 million Xbox Ones

Microsoft has announced that it move 2.4 million consoles in fiscal year 2015 Q1. The announcement came with the latest financial…

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 24 March 2010 01:00

XFX HD 5750 740M XXX 512MB beats reference HD 5750 1024MB - 5. Futuremark Tests

Written by Sanjin Rados

Image

Review: XXX Overclocked edition







XFX HD 5750 512MB XXX YHDA proves that it’s possible, at least in certain scenarios, for a card with less memory but higher clocks to beat a card with more memory and lower clocks.

If we compare XFX HD 5750 512MB and the reference HD 5750 1024MB in synthetic tests, it’s obvious that memory requirements rise only in extreme scenarios with higher resolutions, detail settings, etc.

HD 5750 XXX card scores almost 10% better than reference HD 5750 in Vantage Performance test, but the same advantage practically melts to almost zero in Vantage Xtreme.

Image

Image

Image

Image

(Page 5 of 8)
Last modified on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 11:50
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments