Featured Articles

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC has announced that it will begin volume production of 16nm FinFET products in the second half of 2015, in late…

More...
AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD has missed earnings targets and is planning a substantial job cuts. The company reported quarterly earnings yesterday and the street is…

More...
Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

As expected, Google has finally released the eagerly awaited Nexus 6 phablet and its first 64-bit device, the Nexus 9 tablet.

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 08 December 2009 20:24

LGA 1366 vs. 1156 comparison tests - 3 two vs three channels

Written by Eliot Kucharik

ImageImage

Review: Socket 1366 is obsolete




As we can see, the differences between two channels and three channels are not as big as you might think. Also the latencies are much lower with only two channels populated. Because the Intel board was not able to run with 1600MHz at CL8, we switched to the MSI Eclipse SLI which did work well. It is not always possible to achieve higher memory speeds on the 1366 platform, because it is board and CPU dependent. Some CPUs may work better, while others will not. Socket 1156 CPUs are much easier to overclock and also can run higher memory speeds without too many problems. Also the performance increase comes mostly from the overclocked QPI.

two channels, 1600MHz:
Image

three channels, 1600MHz:
Image


Lets test with some applications:

Image

Image

Image

Image


Let's see how two and three channels setups do in power-consumption tests. Please note that the MSI board which we used for 1600MHz CL8 does consume much less power compared to the Intel board. Also, you can see if you active the turbo mode on the 1366 platform, it gives you only a slight performance enhancement, but it does increase power consumption a lot. Also two channels do consume less power and make this configuration also more efficient.

Image


(Page 3 of 5)
Last modified on Tuesday, 08 December 2009 20:53
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments