Featured Articles

Microsoft officially announces the Xbox One

Microsoft officially announces the Xbox One

As announced earlier, Microsoft has now finally unveiled its next-generation console, the Xbox One. Although it did not shed much light…

More...
AMD poaches more Nvidia talent

AMD poaches more Nvidia talent

AMD has apparently managed to grab yet another high-ranking Nvidian, but this time it was no engineer or developer.

More...
Qualcomm and Samsung overtake AMD

Qualcomm and Samsung overtake AMD

It’s no secret that the mobile boom is taking a toll on makers of PC components and AMD is one of…

More...
Nvidia Geforce GTX 780 detailed

Nvidia Geforce GTX 780 detailed

We managed to confirm the full spec of the upcoming Nvidia Geforce GTX 780 graphics card as well as some performance…

More...
HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

Today we’ll take a closer look at a factory overclocked HD 7790, courtesy of HIS. The HIS HD 7790 iCooler Turbo…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 02 April 2009 22:27

Sapphire and HIS Radeon HD 4890 under the glass - 2. HIS Radeon HD 4890 Turbo and Sapphire HD 4870

Written by Sanjin Rados


Image

Review: Just short of 1000MHz


Both cards on our test come with reference cooling so the only difference is the sticker and the clocks. We’ll show you HIS Turbo card, which is overclocked to 900MHz, and Sapphire’s card running on reference 850MHz.

Since we’ve received both cards without packaging, we’ll only show you the rendered pictures.

Image

Image

Image

The following photos show what Sapphire’s got in store, and although their card runs at reference clocks, the company has already announced the Toxic version with Vapor-X cooling.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

(Page 2 of 3)
Last modified on Saturday, 04 April 2009 00:59
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments