Featured Articles

Broadwell to be faster than Skylake-S in desktop

Broadwell to be faster than Skylake-S in desktop

Intel will do something that it never did before. It will release two processor generations at once in the desktop space.…

More...
ARM’s signs off on 64 bit ARMv8-A

ARM’s signs off on 64 bit ARMv8-A

British chip designer ARM has just signed off its 50th licensing agreement for its ARMv8-A technology, which includes support for 64-bit…

More...
Intel Business vPro market divided into 7 categories

Intel Business vPro market divided into 7 categories

Just a few years ago we had two market segments for business users. We had desktops and notebooks and now Intel…

More...
GTA 5 will make November release

GTA 5 will make November release

While we have continued to hear that Grand Theft Auto V for the Xbox One, PlayStation 4, and PC will not…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 02 April 2009 22:27

Sapphire and HIS Radeon HD 4890 under the glass

Written by Sanjin Rados


Image

Review: Just short of 1000MHz


The new addition to the Radeon family is called HD 4890 and it is AMD’s fastest single-GPU card at the moment. This card will let AMD catch up with the Geforce GTX 260 SP216, and it scores up to 10% better results than the HD 4870 1GB. Since these two cards are not any different specification-wise, the improved scores are a direct result of HD 4890’s higher clocks. It runs at 850MHz, which is 100MHz more compared to HD 4870’s 750MHz. GDDR5 got a boost as well and instead of 3600MHz now runs at 3900MHz.

The new card’s GPU is codenamed RV790 and it packs 959 million transistors. These two graphics cards, the HD 4870 and HD 4850 use the RV770 GPU, and it’s only the clocks that set them apart. We’re currently unaware of anything that’s changed for the RV790 besides optimization and increased clock speeds. There are still 800 stream processors in 10 SIMD clusters, and the 40 texture units and 16 ROPs have been left unchanged as well.

The card’s PCB however, went through some design changes, mostly to regulate additional power requirements, as HD 4890’s higher clocks require more juice to run.

Just like the RV770, the RV790 GPU is built in 55nm and offers 2.5 times more stream processors and texture units than the previous, HD 3800 generation. Additionally, you might remember that the HD 3800 generation lacked in antialiasing performance, and RV770 managed to fix that. With its higher clocks, HD 4890 has a processing power of 1360 GigaFLOPS, whereas the HD 4870 had 1200 GigaFLOPS.

The new card comes with surprising overclocking capabilities, enabling AMD to push the reference clock threshold to 850MHz, so we’re already hearing about partner card designs running at 900MHz. The story about good overclocking is true indeed, as GPU clocks can easily be pushed over 950MHz (1000+ MHz in certain cases), and the memory to over 1100MHz (4400MHz effectively). Overclocking Radeon HD 4870 cards was usually limited to the GPU 850MHz mark, which to HD 4890 is nothing but mere reference clocks, and it proves that AMD did a good job in optimizing the core. Although AMD touts the 1000+MHz core capabilities, we still advise you to be careful as overclocking of course isn’t covered by the warranty.

Note that Radeon HD 4890 starts at €215.

Image

We’ll be seeing reference HD 4890 cards with 1GB of GDDR5 memory at 975MHz (3900MHz effectively), but many partners will opt on either 2GB or 512MB of memory on their cards. Sapphire announced Toxic HD 4890 with Vapor-X technology, and we’ll soon see some water cooled cards which will utilize the RV790’s overclocking potential to the max.

The memory interface is still 256-bit, but thanks to high GDDR5 clocks it has a bandwidth of 124.8GB/s.

Note that GDDR5 memory offers double the bandwidth of identically clocked GDDR3 memory. This means that 512-bit GDDR3 offers the same bandwidth as the 256-bit GDDR5, provided they run at same speeds.

Compared to the GTX 260, where 448-bit GDDR3 memory runs at 999MHz and offers a bandwidth of 111.9GB/s, the HD 4870 with its 256-bit GDDR5 memory clocked at 900MHz offering a 115GB/s bandwidth whereas the HD 4890 clocked at 975MHz scores a bandwidth of 124.8GB/s. Such high bandwidth is of course a direct result of the GDDR5’s speed, which on the HD 4890 runs at 3900MHz.

Image

The cooler looks the same like on the HD 4870 card, but the area underneath the hood went through some design changes. The cooler design stayed the same, but it uses more copper than before, resulting in temperatures lower than on the HD 4870. Now we have three copper heatpipes going from the copper base to the heatsink whereas the HD 4870 uses two copper heatpipes.

Image

Image

Still, the “new” cooler is not significantly heavier as it uses one 8mm and two 6mm pipes, whereas the HD 4870’s cooling uses two thicker, 8mm pipes. Dissipation surface is still the same.

The fan is still the same, NTK Technologies’ CF1275-B30H-C004 DC12V 1.0A, and you can see it on the picture below.

Image

The card is quiet in 2D mode, and while you can hear it in 3D mode, the sound is still not uncomfortably loud and your gaming audio will easily mask it. On the other hand, overclocking to more than 960MHz requires the fan to run at maximum rpm, which has proven to be too loud and your ears definitely won’t like that.

Only a careful observer will notice the difference between the HD 4870 and HD 4890, as an inexperienced eye will surely miss the differences on the back of the card.

Image

Image

The first picture shows the HD 4890 followed by the HD 4870. Notice the part around the green sticker, where the changes are most evident.

Image

Image

The power components have either been altered or replaced with new ones, and this card proudly boasts lower 2D consumption than its predecessor the HD 4870.

Image

HD 4890’s maximum consumption is 190W, whereas the HD 4870 consumes 160W. Both cards require two 6-pin power cables. AMD still keeps the memory frequency at a maximum in 2D mode, which negaitvely impacts power consumption.

Image

The good thing about the cooling is that it pushes the air outside of the case, thus surely making life easier for the rest of the in-case components. The fan is located towards the end and blows air trough the aluminum heatsink and towards the air outlets on the I/O panel.

RV790 offers 7.1 audio as well, courtesy of Realtek HD Audio processor which is integrated directly into the GPU silicone. There’s no need for additional cables, unlike Nvidia’s offerings where you’ll be using a SPDIF cable to bring the audio to the card if you want to send both video and audio to your HDTV device via one cable. This card provides HDMI via the provided DVI-to-HDMI dongle and the I/O panel features two dual-link DVI outs as well as S-Video out. UVD 2 video decoding engine will also provide benefits such as options dual-stream decoding and dynamic contrast enhancement.

Image




Both cards on our test come with reference cooling so the only difference is the sticker and the clocks. We’ll show you HIS Turbo card, which is overclocked to 900MHz, and Sapphire’s card running on reference 850MHz.

Since we’ve received both cards without packaging, we’ll only show you the rendered pictures.

Image

Image

Image

The following photos show what Sapphire’s got in store, and although their card runs at reference clocks, the company has already announced the Toxic version with Vapor-X cooling.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image




Benchmarking

TestBed

Motherboard: MSI P45D3 Platinum ( Provided by: MSI );
Processor: Intel Core 2 QX9770 Extreme edition at 3.6GHz ( Provided by: Intel );
Memory: Corsair Dominator 12800 7-7-7-24 ( Provided by: Corsair);
HDD: WD VelociRaptor 300G 10,000RPM ( Provided by: SmoothCreation );

Today we can see how the HD 4890 fares against the HD 4870, but also against the GTX 260. We included one of the fastest GTX 260 cards into our charts, Gainward's GTX 260 GLH (650 GPU / 1100MHz memory), and in many tests it was faster than AMD's new card, but the GHL is also pricier.

 

3DMark06

3D Mark06 sees the Sapphire snatching a nice start by beating the HD 4870 1GB by about 7% and the GTX 260 by 3%. HIS' overclocked card does a better job, but neither it nor Sapphire managed to beat Gainward's GLH card.

Image

3DMark Vantage reports the HD 4890 1GB to be faster than the HD 4870 1GB by 10-13% in average. Gainward's GLH is constantly on top, beating both HIS' overclocked and Sapphire's card at extreme settings by 8% and 4% respectively.

Image

Image

Image

FarCry 2

FarCry 2 is a game you could easily consider being a card-rapist, but nevertheless the HD4890 fares great. It leaves the GTX 260 Core 216 in the dust at every single resolution, the highest advantage being at 1920x1200 where the GTX 260 Core 216 loses by as much as 20%.

Gainward's overclocked GTX 260 GLH however has proven to be a tough cookie and the cards ended up exchanging lead positions, but note that Gainward's card usually came out on top in 4xAA and Game AF scenarios. HIS' card could be considered the winner in this test, as it kept its lead or parity with Gainward in all the tests but 1680x1050 4xAA Game AF and 2560x1600 4xAA Game AF.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Left4Dead

It seems like Left 4 Dead has developed a taste for AMD's cards, as it beats the reference GTX 260 Core216 card at all the resolutions. We also see it beating Gainward's GLH card up until the high 2560x1600 resolution.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

HD 4890 is faster than the GTX 260 Core216 by 10-20% in average and it seems like ATI has hit a jackpot. HIS' card outran its non-overclocked sibling by 1-4% in average.

World in Conflict

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Power Consumption


Although AMD has reduced idle power consumption, the GTX 260 is still more power efficient. As we already said, the fact that the HD 4890 keeps its memory clocked at 975MHz at all times is partly to blame. The GPU, on the other hand, drops from 850MHz to 240MHz.

Image

Image

Overclocking

AMD was mentioning the card being capable of an overclock to as much as 1000+MHz, but our cards couldn’t manage that.

Image

Unfortunately, we only had enough time to push Sapphire’s card to stable 960MHz core and 1100MHz memory, but you can read more on our overclocking in our following review, where we’ll include results scored by XFX HD 4890 900M XXX, which runs at 900MHz for the core.

Overclocking the core to 960MHz and the memory to 1100MHz (4400MHz effective), increases the lead to 17 percent.


Image

Image

Image

Image




Conclusion

The new Radeon HD 4890 looks much like its older brother the HD 4870, but it runs faster and consumes less power in idle mode. It’s surprisingly good in overclocking but even without it it still runs 100MHz faster than the HD 4870. The memory on the reference cards runs at 975MHz (3900MHz effectively) but it stays at same clocks in idle mode, which can’t be good for consumption. Still, AMD managed to get the HD 4890 to consume less in idle mode, to 60W according to the spec.

The card packs 1024MB of GDDR5 memory, helping it in scoring good results at higher resolutions. We’ve measured more than 12% higher results compared to the HD 4870 1GB card, but the price premium you’ll have to pay for the 12% better performance might not be adequate for everyone. Namely, the card costs €60 more than the HD 4870, but if the price gets any lower then this should be considered as a great gaming card. You have to have in mind that price will go down with the time, and as GTX 275 will be a fearsome competition we are sure that this will happen sooner, rather than later. 

Its overclocking potential is something that should definitely be utilized, and although this card packs a fine share of potential, you should be careful as it of course isn’t covered by the warranty. Close to 1000MHz should be possible but you can definitely expect 900+. If you are ATI man and you want the fastest single card, this is an answer to your prayers and if you care about the price, there is plenty of cheaper one to chose from.






  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »
(Page 1 of 3)
Last modified on Saturday, 04 April 2009 00:59
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments