Featured Articles

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD is fast tracking stacked DRAM deployment and a new presentation leaked by the company  points to APUs with stacked DRAM,…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel has introduced seven new Haswell mobile parts and four Bay Trail SoC chips, but most of them are merely clock…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

Today we'll take a closer look at AMD's A8-7600 APU Kaveri APU, more specifically we'll examine the GPU performance you can…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 19 January 2009 12:31

Corsair DDR3 1600MHz Triple Kit tested - 3 Benchmarks

Written by Eliot Kucharik

ImageImage

Review: Faster memory doesn't help the i7



Benchmarks:

The benches are the usual stuff, so we need not to explain them to you. The most astounding thing happened while testing the Qimonda memory. We were able to clock it to 1600MHz, of course with relaxed timings. The only drawback was, it was able to work stable with hyperthreading disabled, but the only bench were it would matter is FarCry2. This game does not show any advantages if you enable hyperthreading. As usual the x264 bench will suffer with hyperthreading enabled, so it's disabled by default. Please note the Corsair memory is always  running with faster timings compared to Qimonda, so this comparison is a bit unfair, but as you can see, the numbers are very similar.

Image


(Page 3 of 4)
Last modified on Monday, 19 January 2009 21:58
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments