Featured Articles

IDC says PC market is rebounding

IDC says PC market is rebounding

Research firm IDC has published its latest report into the state of the PC market and while there are some signs…

More...
TSMC steps up development of 10nm process

TSMC steps up development of 10nm process

TSMC, the world’s biggest chip foundry for hire, has reportedly stepped up development of its 10nm manufacturing process.

More...
Broadwell 14nm desktop comes late in Q2 2015

Broadwell 14nm desktop comes late in Q2 2015

A while ago we mentioned that Broadwell won’t show up in the desktop space this year and we got it right.…

More...
AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

Today we'll take a closer look at AMD's A8-7600 APU Kaveri APU, more specifically we'll examine the GPU performance you can…

More...
EVGA GTX 780 Classified reviewed

EVGA GTX 780 Classified reviewed

The EVGA GTX 780 Classified has been dethroned as the company’s fastest non-Titan card following the introduction of the GTX 780…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 19 January 2009 12:31

Corsair DDR3 1600MHz Triple Kit tested

Written by Eliot Kucharik

ImageImage

Review: Faster memory doesn't help the i7


With the
new Intel Core i7 platform, memory makers are required to make new kits because it's using triple-channel, which only slightly enhances performance. More important is that Intel is limiting the memory voltages to 1.65V. While it was commonly seen as reasonable to offer fast memory with quite insane voltages, now all memory makers have to select better chips and finally power-consumption will come down too.

In our coverage of Intel's new platform we have tested some memory settings, but our BIOS did not allow us to use 1600MHz due to its beta status. Meanwhile Intel was working hard and has improved the BIOS with new options and increasing the memory multiplier to 14.

The overall problem with faster memory on this platform is, it requires to overclock the CPU cache, so it needs higher voltages, which also will increase power consumption dramatically. Today we'll find out if faster memory does the i7 any good.

Image


Testbed:

Motherboard:
Intel DX58SO "Smackover" (provided by Intel)
Intel  X58/iCH10R

CPU:
Intel Core i7 965XE  (provided by Intel)

CPU-Cooler:
Thermalright Ultra 120 eXtreme 1366 (provided by Thermalright)

Memory:

Qimonda 3GB Kit PC3-8500U (provided by Qimonda)
CL7-7-7-20 CR1 @1.50V
Corsair 6GB Kit PC3-12800 TR3X6G1600C8D (provided by Corsair)
CL8-8-8-24 CR2 @1.65V

Graphics Card:
Jetway Radeon HD3870 (provided by mec-electronics)

Power supply:
Seasonic S12-II 500W

Harddrive:
Samsung Spinpoint F1 500GB

Case fans:
SilenX iXtrema Pro 14dB(A) (provided by PC-Cooling.at)

Case:
Cooler Master Stacker 831 Lite (provided by Cooler Master)


  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »
(Page 1 of 4)
Last modified on Monday, 19 January 2009 21:58
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments