Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 19 January 2009 12:31

Corsair DDR3 1600MHz Triple Kit tested

Written by Eliot Kucharik

ImageImage

Review: Faster memory doesn't help the i7


With the
new Intel Core i7 platform, memory makers are required to make new kits because it's using triple-channel, which only slightly enhances performance. More important is that Intel is limiting the memory voltages to 1.65V. While it was commonly seen as reasonable to offer fast memory with quite insane voltages, now all memory makers have to select better chips and finally power-consumption will come down too.

In our coverage of Intel's new platform we have tested some memory settings, but our BIOS did not allow us to use 1600MHz due to its beta status. Meanwhile Intel was working hard and has improved the BIOS with new options and increasing the memory multiplier to 14.

The overall problem with faster memory on this platform is, it requires to overclock the CPU cache, so it needs higher voltages, which also will increase power consumption dramatically. Today we'll find out if faster memory does the i7 any good.

Image


Testbed:

Motherboard:
Intel DX58SO "Smackover" (provided by Intel)
Intel  X58/iCH10R

CPU:
Intel Core i7 965XE  (provided by Intel)

CPU-Cooler:
Thermalright Ultra 120 eXtreme 1366 (provided by Thermalright)

Memory:

Qimonda 3GB Kit PC3-8500U (provided by Qimonda)
CL7-7-7-20 CR1 @1.50V
Corsair 6GB Kit PC3-12800 TR3X6G1600C8D (provided by Corsair)
CL8-8-8-24 CR2 @1.65V

Graphics Card:
Jetway Radeon HD3870 (provided by mec-electronics)

Power supply:
Seasonic S12-II 500W

Harddrive:
Samsung Spinpoint F1 500GB

Case fans:
SilenX iXtrema Pro 14dB(A) (provided by PC-Cooling.at)

Case:
Cooler Master Stacker 831 Lite (provided by Cooler Master)


  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »
(Page 1 of 4)
Last modified on Monday, 19 January 2009 21:58
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments