Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 23 July 2007 14:18

Intel's cheap E2160 Core 2 Duo goes 3.5 GHz - 3.Benchmarketing

Written by Fudzilla staff
Image

Review: Cheap overclocking miracle

 

Testing

Cinbench 9.5

Cinebench is a free benchmarking tool based on 3D software CINEMA 4D, so the test results usually give good overall system results, especially if we’re talking about a processor, multi-processor systems or multi-core processors.

e2160_cb_stock

In the table you can see the E2160 at  1800MHz, 2400MHz and 3400MHz, and AMD's dual core 3800+ X2 which was included just as a reference.

Cinebench 9.5

1 CPU

x CPU

Multiprocessor Speedup

Intel Core 2 Duo E2160 @ 1800MHz

295

540

x1.83

OC Intel Core 2 Duo E2160 @ 2400MHz

394

721

x1.82

OC Intel Core 2 Duo E2160 @ 3400MHz

553

1005

x1.82

AMD 3800+ X2 @ 2000MHz

293

545

x1.86

OC AMD 3800+ X2 @ 2400MHz

348

639

x1.83


Even at a lower speed setting the E2160 is on par with AMD 3800+ X2 processor. When running at 2.4GHz, Intel easily wins. Although the results of an over-clocked processor are not relevant, or comparable for that matter due to memory speeds; the memory on the over-clocked E2160 ran at 890MHz whereas AMDs memory was kept at 800, the results on the reference speeds still speak for themselves.

ScienceMark 2.0

ScienceMark 2.0 tests for mathematical algorithm processing performance, and in doing that it shows the processing power of a tested processor.

e2160_sm20_stock


ScienceMark results show a slight advantage of C2D E2160 over AMD X2 3800+ processor, and you can see that ScienceMark relies on a pure processing power. Of course the over-clocked E2160 running at 3.4 GHz wins by a greater margin.

 

ScienceMark 2.0

Overall score

Intel Core 2 Duo E2160 @ 1800MHz

1027.21

OC Intel Core 2 Duo E2160 @ 2400MHz

1366.74

OC Intel Core 2 Duo E2160 @ 3400MHz

1881.18

AMD 3800+ X2 @ 2000MHz

1159.59

OC AMD 3800+ X2 @ 2400MHz

1326.10


(Page 3 of 4)
Last modified on Monday, 23 July 2007 14:50
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments