Featured Articles

HP Stream is a Chromebook killer priced at $200

HP Stream is a Chromebook killer priced at $200

We have been hearing reports of a new breed of affordable Windows notebooks for months. It is alleged that a number…

More...
AMD Radeon R7 SSD line-up goes official

AMD Radeon R7 SSD line-up goes official

AMD has officially launched its first ever SSDs and all three are part of AMD’s AMD Radeon R7 SSD series.

More...
KitKat has more than a fifth of Android users

KitKat has more than a fifth of Android users

Android 4.4 is now running on more than a fifth of Android devices, according to Google’s latest figures.

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 03 July 2007 11:23

GeCube HD 2900XT beats 8800GTS 640MB - 2.Testbed

Written by Sanjin Rados
Image

Review: Good bang for your buck


Today’s menu features
GeCube Radeon HD 2900XT graphics card. We wanted to show the new HD 2600 and HD 2400, but those are still in the mail and they didn’t arrive by the press time. GeCube offers five flavors of HD 2600 cards and one HD2400PRO card.

After a long and tedious wait, not to mention the whining of followers, there arose a bunch of ATI cards mostly in the lower categories of the market. ATI is obviously trying to raise some dough by selling these cheap cards, and as their performances are quite similar to the nVidia counter-cards, it is up to you to choose which one you want.

Exact scores are coming soon. An interesting twist is that the prices of Radeon HD 2900XT 512MB dropped under €350. While browsing, we noticed that our test GeCube card can be bought for €333. Not bad if you take into account that the alternative in the same price range is GeForce 8800GTS 640MB. Nvidia is a bit cheaper, but so are the performances.

 

Image


We’ll briefly review the main characteristics of this card, as we’ve written about it a lot, and you can find the first impressions we got when it arrived on May the 14th here.

The graphics processor, codename R600, is the largest one made so far and is made up of 700 million transistors per 420 mm². It has been produced in an 80 nm production process, but due to its size, it emits quite a lot of heat that needs to be effectively taken care of. We’re expecting first high end cards featuring a 65nm core earlier next year, approximately the same time we expect ATI to bounce of the ropes and get back into the leading graphics card manufacturer race.

HD 2900XT cooler is efficient, but quite noisy too. Switching from 2D to 3D is noticeable, the fan runs faster and louder.
Image
A large passive block on the back of the card clearly shows that the card needs good cooling.

ATI now features DirectX hardware and Unified Shader architecture. It is interesting to note that R600 features the Tessellation Unit, which will be usable only with the next version of DirectX. This will enable subdivision of low polygon models, and turning them into high polygon models.

The exact process of Tessellation utilization is still unknown; we only know it will run trough shader API. GeCube HD 2900XT memory runs at 826MHz while the core speed is 743MHz. The reference speeds are 825MHz for memory and 740MHz core speed, but our measurements show a couple of MHz more.

Speaking of shaders, we know that ATIs shader speeds are identical to core speeds, meaning 740MHz. Utilization of Shaders is a good example of different approach to architecture between ATI and Nvidia. Unlike ATI, Nvidia shaders run at their own speeds, often much faster than core speeds. 8800GTX core runs at 675MHz while its shaders run at 1350MHz. Nvidia still has 128 stream processors while ATI has 320. Although it features less Shader units, Nvidias concept is still more successful and its performances are still better.

One of the things we’ve found in a box is a much talked about “The Black Box” voucher. For those that do not know what this means, it is a piece of paper with a product key that gives you access to Steam. The key will also enable you to play Half Life 2 – Episode Two, Team Fortress 2 and Portal as soon as they come out. There have been rumors that this voucher will be replaced by an orange one that was supposedly featuring codes for Half-Life 2 and Half-Life 2: Episode One, but that apparently didn’t happen. ATI still ships the original “The Black Box” version you see on the picture below.


Image

Until these games see the light of day, Valve is inviting all Black Box voucher owners to free gaming of Day Of Defeat: Source. Of course, you have to log in to Steam.

 
The card runs on 500W quality PSU, we tried it, but we still opted to use our default testing PSU OCZ GameXStream 700W. For over-clocking, ATI suggests using 6pin and the other 8pin power connectors we don’t have, but we managed to increase the graphics chip and memory frequency with no trouble whatsoever. For those who want to push their card to the maximum, we recommend recently launched OCZ The New Silencer 750 CrossFire PSU, featuring 6/8pin PCI-E power connectors.

 

Image

 

The box is quite large and it mentions The Black Box voucher. The main features of this card are clearly visible: Vista and Crossfire certified, DirectX 10, HD audio, HDMI (Video and Audio is possible thanks to DVI out), Shader model 4.0, VIVO, HDCP, UVD (Universal Video Decoder). Aaaah, R600s missing UVD again. GeCube made a mistake and ordered the boxes with UVD support banners.

Don’t forget, only RV630 and RV610 feature hardware implemented UVD acceleration logic. CPU burden with R600, HD2900XT will be similar to previous generation cards. Still, those who might buy these cards probably have an expensive and powerful CPU so they won’t notice any disadvantages.

 

Image

 

The box packs a bunch of cables and connectors you might need in any situation. Among them you’ll find a DVI to HDMI bridge, which will enable you to stream audio and video directly from your computer to your TV using only one cable.


 

Testbed 

 

 

Motherboard:
Nforce 680i EVGA board (Supplied by EVGA)
 
CPU:
Intel Core 2 Duo 6800 Extreme edition (Supplied by Intel)

CPU Cooler:
Akasa EVO AK 922 Blue Athlon 64/X2/FX cooler and Intel CPU's (Akasa)

Memory:
OCZ Reaper PC2-8500 1066MHz 5-5-5-15  (Supplied by OCZ)
CL5-5-5-15-CR2T at 2.3V

Graphics card:

GeCube Radeon HD 2900XT 512MB GDDR3  (Supplied by GeCube

Leadtek WinFast PX8800GTS 640MB (Supplied by Leadtek


PSU:
OCZ GameXStream 700W (Supplied by OCZ)

Hard disk:
Seagate Barracuda 7200.9 500GB SATA (Supplied by Seagate)

 



 

Testing

ATI Radeon HD 2900XT is almost two months old and you can buy it for €340. The price is about €40 cheaper than the cheapest GeForce 8800GTS card, but Radeon HD 2900XT is €100 cheaper than 8800GTX card.

Our guest today, GeCube Radeon HD 2900XT runs at 743MHz core speed and 1656MHz memory speed. For testing we used the same scenario as for the first HD2900XT we tested in our lab – Power Color HD 2900XT.

We’ll soon refresh the table with Vista results, but today we’re still using good old Windows XP. The new drivers are also out, so two generations have changed. For now, the drivers are Catalyst 7.6 dating from June. We were (un)lucky to witness the new drivers just upon completion of this test so we had to do the whole thing once again. We left the results of first testing so you can see the difference in performance between the old and the new drivers.


3DMarks 

   

Composite Figures 3Dmark 03

3DMark 03

Game2

Game3

Game4

GeCube HD 2900XT 743/1652 MHz

37259

298.9

239.8

249.4

ATI X1950XTX 650/200 MHz

22799

176.2

126.9

142.4

Leadtek WinFast PX8800GTS 640MB

32253

269.1

202.4

190.1

NVIDIA 8800GTX 575/1800 MHz

39904

350.9

258.7

227.4

Zotac 8800GTX 630/2000 MHz

41775

371.8

270.0

239.2

 

 

 

 

 

Composite Figures 3Dmark 03

Single Texturinng

Multi Textur.

Vertex Shader

Pixel Shader 2.0

GeCube HD 2900XT 743/1652 MHz

7611.4

11365.4

202.4

371.5

ATI X1950XTX 650/200 MHz

5346.5

10005.9

78.1

241.6

Leadtek WinFast PX8800GTS 640MB

5098.1

11878.9

102.6

483.9

NVIDIA 8800GTX 575/1800 MHz

6855.4

17652.4

127.7

643.9

Zotac 8800GTX 630/2000 MHz

7387.9

19013.4

133.5

643.9

 

 

 

 

 


In 3DMark03 test, GeCube Radeon HD 2900XT is closer to 8800GTX card than 8800GTS one. We see it’s much better than Radeon X1950XTX, it scored 14612 marks more – it equals 63% more power. HD 2900XT is 5158 marks better than GeForce 8800GTS, but it loses to GeForce 8800 GTX by about 3000 marks.

   

Composite Figures 3Dmark 03

3DMark 03

Game2

Game3

Game4

PowerColor HD 2900XT 742/1650 MHz driver 8.364

37411

302.9

240.9

250.5

GeCube HD 2900XT 743/1652 MHz Catalyst 7.5

37208

297.2

239.4

249.1

GeCube HD 2900XT 743/1652 MHz Catalyst 7.6

37259

298.9

239.8

249.4


 

 

 

 


The first column features results from April when we tested it with the unofficial driver version 8.364. 3DMark03 is still the only test that yearns for the old drivers. The new Catalyst 7.6 version is a bit better than Catalyst 7.5.

   

Composite Figures 3Dmark 05

3DMark 05

Game1

Game2

Game3

GeCube HD 2900XT 743/1652 MHz

18211

65.0

51.0

116.6

ATI X1950XTX 650/200 MHz

13152

59.3

35.8

68.5

Leadtek WinFast PX8800GTS 640MB

15819

63.3

47.3

84.6

NVIDIA 8800GTX 575/1800 MHz

17147

63.7

49.7

102.0

 

 

 

 

 

Composite Figures 3Dmark 05

Single Texturinng

Multi Textur.

Pixel Shader

VS/VS
complex

GeCube HD 2900XT 743/1652 MHz

7922.0

11755.5

556.2

261.0/193.3

ATI X1950XTX 650/200 MHz

5890.6

9644.0

454.8

152.7/62.0

Leadtek WinFast PX8800GTS 640MB

5149.7

11888.6

408.9

(Page 2 of 3)
Last modified on Friday, 06 July 2007 14:30
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments