Featured Articles

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

Intel's 5th Core processor family, codenamed Broadwell, will launch in three lines for the mobile segment. We are talking about upcoming…

More...
Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Google's Chromebook OS should be updating automatically every six weeks, but Intel doesn't come close with its hardware refresh schedule.

More...
New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

Rumours involving upcoming Nexus devices are nothing uncommon, but this year there is a fair bit of confusion, especially on the…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 14 May 2007 13:47

Power Color / ATI R600, Radeon HD 2900XT - 3. Test 3Dmarks

Written by Fuad Abazovic

Image

Review: R600XT finally revealed, a bit bitter

 The R600 chip is probably the most delayed chip in the history of ATI. It was supposed to show its face in October / November time but too many things went wrong.

The biggest problem of all was that the G80 was far better than anyone could have expected and Nvidia had a secret weapon, Shaders clocked twice as fast of the GPU speed.

R600 was a nice concept with 320 stream processors or Shader units divided in four blocks and 512 Mbit memory interface. Unfortunately this 700 million transistor chip was way to hot and the performance was not that great.

Image

ATI was ready with its R600 generation in early March, but the performance was so bad that the company decided to postpone the launch till it gets a better driver. Well, they could not push it any further and ATI decided to launch the Radeon HD 2900XT, a cheaper high end card, and to cover the R600 flaws with a Half life 2 episode two voucher.

We had a chance to take a look at two cards, an ATI reference Radeon HD 2900XT and Power Color's Radeon HD 2900XT. As both cards were the same we decided to post the Power Color stuff only as it is based on the same reference design.

Image

The card is clocked at 742/1650 MHz and these are the final clocks of the reference design cards. You can read more about the cooler here, but the story is simple. The card ends up very hot. My biggest problem with the cooler is that it tends to be quite noisy in 3D. In 2D mode the card works at 507 MHz core and it doesn't make much noise. 

Well, we wont pay much attention to the temperature of the card as the high end cards can get hot and even the 8800 GTX card ends up close to 80 Celsius if not more on the power components. The r600XT GPU heats up, up to acceptable 71 Celsius and it works stable.


The card comes with a voucher the same as we pictured a few days ago here.

 


AMD's own user guide suggests a 750W PSU and you can read it here but we tested and figured out that a single Radeon HD 2900XT works with a quality 500W as well. However it won't work with every 500W PSU, especially not with the cheap ones.

Image

We won't go much into the architecture, as we wrote about it before but it is important to mention that ATI chip has 64 Shader units and they can deal with Vec5 scalar functions. ATI and a few developers claim that R600 has a much better geometry Shader than Nvidia but this is a DirectX 10 feature only and there are no any DirectX 10 games to put this claim to the test.

One other interesting thing is the DVI to HDMI dongle that should be able to take care of Audio but we didn’t had a chance to play with this much.

Image

ATI has a few drives but the launch one is called 8.364, however we also learned that 8.374a and b were available to a few of reviewers. There should be a 8.378 that can improve the performance for additional five percent but this is yet to be seen.

Image

Image

The card has two PCIe power connectors one 4x2 pin for overdrive overclocking while the second one is the standard 3x2 pins. The card will work with two 3x2 pin connectors, but the driver wont recognize the overdrive overclocking option.

Image

Finally the card has an internal Crossfire connector and it looks identical to the ones we saw on RV570 based Radeon X1950 PRO cards.

The package includes two DVI dongles, DVI to HDMI dongle, HDTV cable and Avivo analogue cables.

Image

Let's not forget the Crossfire internal connector.  The package also includes the Voucher for Half Life 2 episode 2, team fortress 2 and portal games. You can also play Day of Defeat source game when you buy this card and unfortunately this is the only game that is actually out.


Image


 


Test:

We used our usual test setup and compared the card with 8800 GTX and GTS 640 MB cards as these are the real competitors of the Radeon HD 2900XTX. In some scores we used an overclocked EVGA AC3 8800GTX 652/2000 MHz, so the card that should be very close to Geforce 8800 Ultra speeds.

We will focus on the scores of Radeon HD 2900XT versus Geforce 8800 GTS 640, but we will comment the other scores as well.

To make one thing clear at the beginning Radeon HD 2900XT almost never wins over Geforce 8800 GTX, not to mention the overclocked 8800 GTX. It is not in the same legue but to be fair it is a bit cheaper than these cards.

We used:

Intel Core 2 Duo 6800 Extreme edition
Nforce 680i EVGA board
Corsair Dominator TWIN2X1024-8500 at 5-5-5-15 at 1066 MHz
Seagate Barracuda 7200.9 400GB SATA NCQ hard drive
Akasa EVO AK 922 Blue Athlon 64/X2/FX cooler and Intel CPU's
Silverstone DA750W modular PSU


Composite Figures 3Dmark 03

3DMark 03

Game2

Game3

Game4

ATI HD 2900XT 742/1650 MHz

37411

302.9

240.9

250.5

ATI X1950XTX 650/200 MHz

22799

176.2

126.9

142.4

Leadtek WinFast PX8800GTS 640MB

32253

269.1

202.4

190.1

EVGA AC3 8800GTX 626/2000 MHz

42705

381.1

277.4

244.7

NVIDIA 8800GTX 575/1800 MHz

39904

350.9

258.7

227.4

 

 

 

 

 

Composite Figures 3Dmark 03

Single Texturinng

Multi Textur.

Vertex Shader

Pixel Shader 2.0

ATI HD 2900XT 742/1650 MHz

7588.5

11346.4

203.7

372.4

ATI X1950XTX 650/200 MHz

5346.5

10005.9

78.1

241.6

Leadtek WinFast PX8800GTS 640MB

5098.1

11878.9

102.6

483.9

EVGA AC3 8800GTX 626/2000 MHz

7453.4

19179.5

138.1

700.5

NVIDIA 8800GTX 575/1800 MHz

6855.4

17652.4

127.7

643.9

 

Composite Figures 3Dmark 05

3DMark 05

Game1

Game2

Game3

ATI HD 2900XT 742/1650 MHz

16794

64.1

50.9

93.9

ATI X1950XTX 650/200 MHz

13152

59.3

35.8

68.5

Leadtek WinFast PX8800GTS 640MB

15819

63.3

47.3

84.6

EVGA AC3 8800GTX 626/2000 MHz

17554

63.7

49.6

109.5

NVIDIA 8800GTX 575/1800 MHz

17147

63.7

49.7

102.0

 

 

 

 

 

Composite Figures 3Dmark 05

Single Texturinng

Multi Textur.

Pixel Shader

VS/VS
complex

ATI HD 2900XT 742/1650 MHz

7910.8

11759.2

511.6

285.1/193.0

ATI X1950XTX 650/200 MHz

5890.6

9644.0

454.8

152.7/62.0

Leadtek WinFast PX8800GTS 640MB

5149.7

11888.6

408.9

124.1/115.3

EVGA AC3 8800GTX 626/2000 MHz

7514.8

19169.9

648.2

152.0/141.1

NVIDIA 8800GTX 575/1800 MHz

6926.7

17610.4

(Page 3 of 3)
Last modified on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 11:41
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments