Featured Articles

Nvidia GTX 770 spec is out

Nvidia GTX 770 spec is out

In addition to the GK110 based Nvidia Geforce GTX 780, we managed to get some details regarding the GK104-based GTX 770…

More...
Nvidia Geforce GTX 780 detailed

Nvidia Geforce GTX 780 detailed

We managed to confirm the full spec of the upcoming Nvidia Geforce GTX 780 graphics card as well as some performance…

More...
AMD shares take rollercoaster ride

AMD shares take rollercoaster ride

In the last 52 weeks AMD was on a rollercoaster ride, with prices ranging from $1.81 to $6.46. Yesterday it closed…

More...
HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

Today we’ll take a closer look at a factory overclocked HD 7790, courtesy of HIS. The HIS HD 7790 iCooler Turbo…

More...
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 Generation 3 (32GB) reviewed

Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 Generation 3 (32GB) reviewed

High capacity USB drives have become commonplace a while ago, but although some memory outfits are peddling huge drives, up…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 14 May 2007 11:33

HIS X1950Pro AGP in action - 3. Testing and Conclusion

Written by Sanjin Rados
Image

Review: The fastest AGP from ATI


Testing:

We tested the card under Vista OS and added the results of recently tested HIS X1650 IceQ Turbo card for comparison. The X1950 Pro is the best ATI AGP card that money can buy, unfortunately we didn't have any matching Nvidia card to compare the results. We tried to overclock the card, and to out surprise, we had some luck. We managed to push the core up by 51 MHz, and it ended up at 641 MHz, which is 66 MHz higher then reference clock.

Samsung's 1.25 ns memory worked well even on 1674 MHz, which is 294 MHz higher then reference clock at a modest 1380 MHz. Even with these much higher clocks, the card didn't show any significantly higher results. So we advise you to stick to default clocks which will at least prolong the cards life.

Synthetic tests:

Composite Figures 3Dmark 03

3DMark 03

Game2

Game3

Game4

HIS X1650XT IceQ Turbo 600/1460 MHz

11502

89.5

70.6

79.0

HIS X1950PRO IceQ Turbo 590/1540 MHz

14778

121.9

92.1

98.3

HIS X1950PRO IceQ Turbo 641/1674 MHz

15845

132.6

99.0

106.2

 

 

 

 

 

CPU Test

CPU Score 

CPU Test 1

CPU Test 2

 

HIS X1650XT IceQ Turbo 600/1460 MHz

1074

114.9

19.9

 

HIS X1950PRO IceQ Turbo 590/1540 MHz

1094

116.9

20.3

 

HIS X1950PRO IceQ Turbo 641/1674 MHz

1092

116.6

20.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

Composite Figures 3Dmark 03

Single Texturinng

Multi Textur.

Vertex Shader

Pixel Shader 2.0

HIS X1650XT IceQ Turbo 600/1460 MHz

2022.1

4549.5

53.5

74.4

HIS X1950PRO IceQ Turbo 590/1540 MHz

4200.6

6830.3

55.5

158.8

HIS X1950PRO IceQ Turbo 641/1674 MHz

4577.4

7461.9

59.8

173.6

 

 

Composite Figures 3Dmark 05

3DMark 05

Game1

Game2

Game3

HIS X1650XT IceQ Turbo 600/1460 MHz

7215

32.1

21.4

35.0

HIS X1950PRO IceQ Turbo 590/1540 MHz

9065

36.8

26.0

49.8

HIS X1950PRO IceQ Turbo 634/174 MHz

9276

36.5

26.3

53.1

 

 

 

 

 

CPU Test

CPU Score 

CPU Test 1

CPU Test 2

 

HIS X1650XT IceQ Turbo 600/1460 MHz

6477

4.0

4.7

 

HIS X1950PRO IceQ Turbo 590/1540 MHz

6573

4.0

4.8

 

HIS X1950PRO IceQ Turbo 634/174 MHz

6542

4.0

4.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

Composite Figures 3Dmark 05

Single Texturinng

Multi Textur.

Pixel Shader

VS/VS
complex

HIS X1650XT IceQ Turbo 600/1460 MHz

2238.7

4587.5

198.9

80.4/56.2

HIS X1950PRO IceQ Turbo 590/1540 MHz

4718.1

6905.0

333.8

133.3/55.8

HIS X1950PRO IceQ Turbo 634/174 MHz

5169.9

7089.9

360.8

143.6/60.3

 

 

Composite Figures 3Dmark 06

3DMark 06

 

 

 

HIS X1650XT IceQ Turbo 600/1460 MHz

3008

 

 

 

HIS X1950PRO IceQ Turbo 590/1540 MHz

4302

 

 

 

HIS X1950PRO IceQ Turbo 641/1674 MHz

4543

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Page 3 of 3)
Last modified on Monday, 14 May 2007 11:48
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments