Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

Intel's 5th Core processor family, codenamed Broadwell, will launch in three lines for the mobile segment. We are talking about upcoming…

More...
Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Google's Chromebook OS should be updating automatically every six weeks, but Intel doesn't come close with its hardware refresh schedule.

More...
New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

Rumours involving upcoming Nexus devices are nothing uncommon, but this year there is a fair bit of confusion, especially on the…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 11 December 2007 09:53

European Patent Office throws out Amazon patent

Written by

Image

Gift Order belongs to Santa


The
European Patent Office review board has decided that Amazon's "Gift Order Patent" should be revoked.

European Patent EP 0 927 945, was granted to Amazon on 23 April 2003. It specifies a method by which a person can purchase a product as a gift and have it shipped based on the e-mail address of the recipient.

The system contacts the person who was to receive the gift and gets their address to send them the present. The patent was opposed by Fleurop Interflora Businesses, the German Society of Information Sciences, and the Foundation for Free Information Infrastructure (FFII).

The three claimed that the patent fell short of meeting the criteria of providing an “inventive step,” as defined in Article 56 of the European Patent Convention (EPC).
Last modified on Wednesday, 12 December 2007 03:47

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments