Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:08

The reason behind the G1's lack of multi-touch

Written by Nedim Hadzic

ImageImage

Well, Apple asked nicely

 

T-Mobile’s G1, the first Android-based phone has been often criticized over its lack of multi-touch technology. This technology, as you might know, allows touch screens to accept multiple points of contact simultaneously, and although Android and the G1’s screen both can support it, it hasn’t been implemented here.

An unnamed Android team member claims that Apple had asked Google not to implement this technology, and Google strangely enough agreed. However, this shouldn’t sound as strange after knowing that Apple’s allegedly considering legally pursuing Palm for the company’s usage of multi-touch technology on their Pre phone.

So, if this is indeed true, then it seems Google will try pretty much everything not to stir Apple’s waters, but this would still be a lame reason for the G1’s lack of support. On the other hand, if you’re really keen on getting this feature, we’re sure that we’ll see some workarounds, probably of dubious legality, such as this one.

More here.

Last modified on Wednesday, 11 February 2009 13:17
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments